Agnostic.com

3 1

Does theoretical physics prove we are infinite beings?

A few questions in theoretical physics are actually explained if the universe is what we're creating by our own minds and we're just the awareness - the philosophy of nonduality.

  1. Speed of light as a constant. We know the speed of light. We can actually measure it by meter deflection. Thus the theory of general relativity can be wiggled around algebraically to see how much it changes based on the velocity of the observer. But, it doesn't change. It should by all we know in physics. But instead it's still a constant. It seems impossible.

But ... let's approach Einstein's paradox from the nonduality perspective. We KNOW through the double slit experiment that the quantum field of probability is not broken until awareness enters the scene and it "decides". We're assuming awareness is OUR perception here on earth so we calculate using that difference in distance. However if awareness is instead one and infinite then awareness is already surrounding the star billions of light years away for the quantum field to decide. It's instantaneous. So that awareness trigger is already there and the distance doesn't matter ... hence why we see it as a constant speed despite the facts telling us algebraically that it shouldnt be. That was where Einsteins' flaw lied in his scenario - awareness is instantaneous so there's no lag to actuate that end of the event.

  1. This would likewise explain the distance issues involved with quantum entanglement which perplex modern explanation. The distance that confounds us is only in our heads. Literally.

  2. Double slit experiment paradox explains away now as well.

  3. Last, but certainly not least, the issue of matter is now resolved. There's no elementary particle. There are only events in probability fields that awareness sets off continuously in its' role as the doer in physics so to speak. The very smallest things we think are particles are all just localized events in a dynamic universe that escape explanation in a static field.

You're welcome to not agree. But at least respond with something that actually makes sense instead of words like "woo" and shit like that. If you don't know then don't sling stones. namaste

JeffMesser 8 Apr 28
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Jeff, mathematicians refer to themselves as theoretical physicists and do not test their hypotheses in the laboratory. They are doing mathematics, a form of logic, not physics.
Are you supporting your conclusions with laboratory evidence?

I am engaging in the same discussions that Einstein engaged in.

2

Although science can disprove some things, apart from math, science has/can never prove anything -- there is always some doubt/error bars/new idea(s).

2

It seems to me that physics shows definitely that reality can not be understood in terms of the space/time/matter model of our imaginary sense-world.

“Proof” might be too strong a word with respect to universal consciousness. however a number of prominent physicists have endorsed the concept.

Proof is relative. What is true for one person might be false for another. Typically people think that to prove is to anchor a postulate into the world of our senses through observation—for them universal consciousness is impossible.

Quantum level experiments seem to lead the way. There are ESP and reincarnation studies, but those are DOA to the perpetual skeptics, no matter how rigorously conducted.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:490079
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.