Agnostic.com

3 0

Should Section 230 be revoked ? why/not ?

Joe Biden doesn’t like Trump’s Twitter order, but still wants to revoke Section 230

The campaign said his position hasn’t changed

[theverge.com]

"Should social networks fact-check political speech ? why/not ?"

FearlessFly 9 May 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0
0

Websites will be unable to control the types of conversations on their forums. Stackoverflow would become reddit. Basically it will be impossible for public discourse to occur and the right wing fascists of government will control the narrative, until the ultra-leftists grab it .. so it will stay fucked forever if Section 230 is repealed. Political websites especially will be screwed .. for example a Christian forum can be taken over by atheists. An anti-abortion site can become dominated by pro-abortion.. so the result will be discussion forums won't exist at all. Nobody will be willing to risk being sued or spend money on moderating them .. it won't even be remotely financially possible.

0
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:500748
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.