Agnostic.com

35 2

If you could go back in time to a time before your birth when and where would you go?

You would have to stay for at least six months

paul1967 8 Apr 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

35 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Don't think would take you up on the offer unless I could change history. If I could have stopped the Holocaust by killing Hitler early I would try to save all those millions of lives he destroyed.

Curious question, if you were standing alone in front of baby Adolph's crib would you be able to muster the pyschological strength to snuff out that babies life knowing what the future holds if you didn't? I don't know if I could or if I should. Too many what ifs.

@paul1967 I know you weren't asking me, but in order to summon the strength, I would only need to picture what I saw when I visited Dachau, The Documentation Center Nazi Party Rallying Grounds in Nuremburg and the Shoah / Holocaust museums in Washington DC, Paris and a number of other cities. Of course, one might think to kidnap little Adolf, and bring him 'back to the future.' ...could present an interesting 'nature vs. nurture' case study. 😉

Killing the 3rd pope would have saved many more lives.

Yad Vashem the memorial to the 6 Million from all the camps did it for me 40 years ago. I will never forget those cases of teeth, hair, eyeglasses, wedding rings, and toys displayed like corpses were a commodity they stripped of all dignity. One reminder of that and I could do it.

@pnullifidian Adolph's wasn't always the sinister monster he became. He started out as an artist and had he been a better artist I think we would have just had someone else. I'm not sure if killing Adolph would be for the best. WHAT IF someone else had taken his place who was a little less impulsive. What if you killed Adolph and returned to discover Germany had won the war because Heinrich Himmler stepped forward as the leader of the Nazi party or someone with more military savviness. In all likelihood killing Hitler as an infant would not stop the future. We know what happened with Hitler we would be gambling with changing history.

still think I would do it to save all those lives. I suppose killing all of them-attempts were made-would have been the answer.

@paul1967 Please refer to my initial posts below regarding my disregard for the time travel paradox, the issue of 'key man theory' vs. 'grass roots' view of history, and Hitler in general. Bottom line, it's a thought experiment, you get one shot at it, and judging from the responses, it seems you either pick a time and place for self fulfillment and fun, or you choose to make a positive change, based on the historical record.

@azzow2 True, but Hitler hits much too close to home, if you catch my drift.

0

I would actually go to when Jesus walked the earth. I don’t believe in god so I’d really like to hear Jesus speak in person.

You might be disappointed. The Bible tends to exaggerate the qualities of its leading characters just a bit, don't you think?

I think there is a reasonable chance you wouldn't find him.

i believe that jesus lived a long life and died a Buddhist monk and is burried in a tomb in the middle east.

@pnullifidian that’s exactly why I want to go. To see the truth.

@paul1967 perhaps. But then I would know. I think he might have been the worlds first salesman.

@BAMBISPICE I would wager that you are correct.

@BAMBISPICE I'm just curious, was your statement about the life of Jesus based on any solid evidence or were you just joking?

2

Mine would be to travel back and meet Shakespeare.

I wonder what he was really like as a person. I bet he was an odd character.

@paul1967 he must have been pretty busy too.

he? or she?

@paul1967 inquiring minds want to know! 🙂

@JimG exactly!

@BAMBISPICE that question as well!

5

I've thought this one through many times. If I were given only one shot, and even if I could not return, I would unhesitatingly choose to go back to Braunau am Inn, a small town in Austria, right around April 20, 1889, and there I would find a way to smother a little bastard baby named Adolf Schicklgruber in his crib!

Do you think that would prevent what he did later, or would we remember someone else for committing his crimes now?

Your idea sounds great in theory, but he didn't organize the National Socialist Party, and found plenty of men who were more than willing to murder millions. I think someone just as evil, but more capable may have been the alternative to Hitler.

What if that action set a series of events that created a man who was identical but who won WWII?

@Fulishsage You and @JimG are, to state it very simplistically, questioning the 'key man' theory of history, vs. grass roots movements. And while we can play the ‘what if’ game and run a bevy of variables through this thought experiment, I base my admittedly visceral choice to ‘pre-assassinate’ Adolf Hitler on the historical record.

The post-World War I reparations that were placed on Germany no doubt created the conditions for a Hitler, and rabid anti-Semitism has existed, in varying degree, throughout European history. But this narcissistic author of Mein Kampf who demonstrated the gift of oratory, and rallied unwavering loyalty while instilling absolute fear and terror in the hearts of his subordinates, was, in my view, a unique personality. Were there other junior Hitlers out there? Who knows.

The point is, while I don't believe time travel is possible, this is merely a response to a 'fantasy' question. And you gotta start somewhere when it comes to the horrors of Nazi Germany. I’ve never been a fan of being concerned about the time travel paradox—the whole point of time travel is that you will, even as an observer, change the past, and thus the future, so you might as well go in guns blazing. Hell, if I were the Captain of the USS Nimitz in ‘The Final Countdown’ I would have, without hesitation, ordered the destruction of the Japanese fleet!

@pnullifidian touche

@Fulishsage Merci Monsieur ... mes compliments!

same as my answer - but earlier.

4

Egypt 2500 BCE, to see how they really did build pyramids, then go further back to when the Sphinx was built to ask who built it and why.

This is a question and not a dig, but don't we already know how the pyramids were built?

@paul1967 Good educated guesses but since no plans have been left to see we can't be sure. Seeing the building plans or working with the architect would to me be a dream come true. Also there are disputes going on about the age of the Sphinx.

@buzz13 At least you're not suggesting an alien influence ... right?

@pnullifidian Correcto mundo!

5

We don’t know the limitations here but if I could take my camera and then come back, I would go to the Royal Library of Alexandria well before it was destroyed and try to get permission to photograph every available item that I could. It would answer a lot of questions.

gearl Level 8 Apr 4, 2018

That would be amazing. So much lost history, art, and knowledge would be made available to us again.

That is a great idea!

@icolan Especially as I don't speak ancient anything. As far as the camera goes they would be like kids. Take a couple and show them in playback.

@gearl Your gadgetry and knowledge of the laws of nature would have them eating from the palm of your hand. As Arthur C. Clarke noted, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

0

Probably the day before my birth to put a stop to that whole debacle.

BenP Level 3 Apr 4, 2018

Nope, we need you here.

@icolan or it could cause a parallel universe in which he never was born to form spontaneously. However, he obviously wouldn't exist in it, and would be stuck in our universe and continue to exist here.

@icolan LOL!

1

Why 1980?

Go visit me before 'July 85 and talk me out of going camping on the 4th. ;}

@paul1967 bowie man

@LadyAlyxandrea Of course! Silly me, that would be a trip (pun intended) worth taking.

2

I realize I've already commented, but I'm compelled to remind the group how difficult it would be for a 21st century citizen to adjust to the environment of the past. Language and colloquialisms aside, one is forced to deal with the stench, lack of hygiene, rotting foods, superstitions, unclean practices, not to mention limited access to basic medicines. Suffer an injury or illness even a century ago, and your chances of survival are severly diminished. We sometimes are tempted to wax romantic about the past, but given the choice, wouldn't we all be better off seeing the future?

OK, you talked me out of it.

I wouldn't step one foot in the future. Well, I guess I do that every moment of every day, but I wouldn't want to go far into the future. I would be too afraid of what I might see.

yeah, i was thinking whatever choice i made i would have to add the caveat :like in the movies

@paul1967 Yes, but if what we were to see was not THE future, but A future, and we didn't like what we saw, might we be able to change it, upon our return?

2

I'd go back to the American Dust Bowl and see if this farm boy could survive.

A man who likes a challenge. Respect!

Go back farther and teach them about soil conservation.

@JimG I could school 'em on Sir Albert Howard!

1

Dr. King please don't go out on that balcony.

Not before m birth....but still.

That might be good, it also might be very bad. It's a big roll of the dice.

@paul1967 You mean in his work having more attention as a martyr?

@BufftonBeotch Not martyrdom so much, because Martin Luther King Jr was a passivist, but It could be any number of things from white power movements gaining more support or the impact that could have been lost on whites American consciousness. I don't have any way of measuring the effect of watching the aftermath of the murder committed by James Earl Ray on TV. I have to imagine many Americans who were willing to not get involved rethought their position after seeing just how evil it is to do nothing while white supremacist pushes back on equal rights laws. It could be however that by saving his life, you expedite a change in America and things get better quicker. I just don't know.

1

I'd go to Farmington, Maine in about 1920, want to be about age 20 and enjoy the Sandy River and Rangely Lakes Railroad. Very unique, two foot gauge. After 1935 I'd migrate to Bridgton, Maine, for a couple of years, then probably to the Colorado three foot gauge railways, stopping in Orbisonia, Pennsyvania for a while on the way at the East Broad Top.

Now, all this being said, I would probably died at age 49, as the cancer I had was a death sentance at the time, however, since that cancer was likely the result of exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam, that might not be an issue.

The way I would look at it is, you had a good life before you left, you added to life by becoming 20 again so even if you died 25 to 30 years later you still lived a good long life.

Used to work in Bridgeton, ME/Lake Sebago area back in college. Please check out our Cancer Survivors Group.

0

Alpha Centauri
4M years ago

Why?

@paul1967 Nothing to see here, rather go there.

2

To Italy to and talk to Leonardo da Vinci

Do you speak Italian?

@paul1967 I am a quick study.

2

That depends. With no other enhancement, I would likely have to go to a time and place where English was spoken, in order to get anything done. That narrows my options. However, my first thought would be to go back to 1980 and save John Lennon.
If, however, I was also able to communicate in the language of the place and time, I've often fantasized about warning Boudica not to attack the Romans at the place of their choosing, but rather to force them to attack her at the place of HER choosing.

I wonder what impact changes like those would have on the future.

good idea on lennon, imagine how much less warlike we would be if he was still around. effing marines

3

The roaring 20s

yes, 1925 is my choice.

I do like the clothes. I think that was the birth of extreme fun fashion in America.

2

I know I wouldn't try to change key moments. Any number of unpleasant things might happen. I would like to just find an interesting time period and observe it (though I hope I'd do a better job of it than those bald guys from Fringe), maybe the 1920s.

yeah, i'll be in vienna in 1925.

kensington 1920 was my second choice

2

I'd go back 30,000 years to Gibraltar and spend a while living among the last tribes of Neanderthals who lived there. I think they might have been able to teach me a lot.

Maybe get to know this one::

[qph.fs.quoracdn.net]

that could be fascinating.

we have between 1 and 7% neanderthal in our dna

2

I'd go back before the Big Bang. Just curious.

I'm not sure how that would work, according to everything I've read you would pop into existence before spacetime. I suppose by doing that you could become the big bang and be the creator of the universe. 😉

And according to everything I've read, you can't travel back in time. Do paradoxes cancel?

1

I would like to dwell on the other way around..... How about going to the future. What would you like to see??

You might see paradise but if I were a betting man, I would guess it would fall far short of that.

Actually what I would like to see is where technology is going to go in, lets say, 200 years.... That I would love to see !!!

2

At the moment, I think I'd choose the early 20th century. Maybe 1910. I'd like to find Nikola Tesla and learn as much from him as I could.

You might find out he's a time traveler too lol

2

If you mean traveling in a time machine and being able to observe from the machine, I'd like to see the dinosaur age. If you mean going back and time and being born, then I don't want to go back at all. Women are barely treated as humans now, and older societies often treated women as chattel.

Fair point.

3

A day before the last largest lotto and pick all the winners.

money corrupts

2

1920's any large U.S. city. Feel a connection to that era.

just read capone . chicago would have been nuts !

1

I think that about 65 Ma would be interesting. Seeing the meteor impact would be a sight, but surviving might be a bit tricky.
I think about 375 Ma would be just as interesting if not more interesting, the first land creatures. An explosion of life. Just to see how things transformed at that time, would be incredible. I think as long as atmospheric conditions were good, I could live there for some time.

You wouldn't be alone. You would see me wandering around taking pictures of everything. I might get eaten, but it would be worth the risk.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:50376
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.