whats wrong with it? one thing, spelling snobs made their appearance. whats right with it is that its operating first premise, atheism and/or skepticism, is carl sagan's premise, so its an excuse for like minds to assemble. thats more than enough. quality of course will fluctuate over time. are you too simple to realize that?

The changes to the site layout are awful too. And I see no way to make it better in settings. I really can live without a million picture of cats.

I don't follow the fake intellectuals, and the photos don't bother me. And, spelling isn't a prerequisite for membership.

So you're complaining?

It was pretty obvious. Don't these guys pay attention when their misspellings are highlighted? For me some things are just not worth commenting on.

I just figured a bunch of twelve year olds HAD just wandered in... ‍

Ugh! I must admit this was disturbing to me, too. Still, intelligent conversation seems to still outweigh the other stuff.

It is what happens when a site purpose is watered down and watered down for the purpose of broadening its appeal, when administrators think that 'middle of the road' means anything goes.

When I joined this site I was looking for a platform for a community committed to the values of atheism, secularism, and the ideal of creating a world of science, reason and social justice.

This 'ain't' it.

It's getting old. I won't say it's ruining the site but not very creative.