Dawkins is very well informed in regards to atheism and religion, but he faile dot do his research about trans persons.
I respect him for his well iformed views, but not his recent misinformed views about trans persons.
This is not the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th... time he’s said cringe inducing stuff on Twitter. Not a one-off incident. It amazes me how he remains the Teflon Atheist (Reagan reference). What compels people to defend him? I don’t get it. Inspires my dabbling in post-atheism.