Agnostic.com

3 12

Evolution Produced All Creatures, Including Skeptics

Evolution is ruthless, heartless, killing off most creatures it spawns. Almost 99 percent of all species that ever lived became extinct – and humans nearly did. National Geographic genome expert Spencer Wells says the last Ice Age, perhaps coupled with a super-volcano in Sumatra, almost exterminated humans before they migrated from Africa. He wrote:

“While homo sapiens can be traced to around 200,000 years ago in the fossil record, it is remarkably difficult to find an archaeological record of our species between 80,000 and 50,000 years ago, and genetic data suggest that the population eventually dwindled to as few as 2,000 individuals. Yes, 2,000 – fewer than fit into many symphony halls. We were on the brink of extinction.”

In his final chapter, “Alone and Free in the Universe,” Dr. Wilson concludes that scientific understanding of evolution has become the bedrock of biology, and it explains why humans became tribalized, with tribal religions.

Evolution gave people large brains capable of imagining invisible gods – and it gave some people keener minds capable of seeing that imaginary gods are nonsense.

Full Article: [patheos.com]

nogod4me 8 Apr 14
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Given the expanse of time, extinction is an inevitable certainty.

5

Ain't that the truth..

4

Evolution produced a lot of stupidity and utter blindness too.

Just remember, evolution operates by natural selection trimming away (killing off, before they can reproduce) the variants (individuals) that are less fit to survive in a given environment. Fitness is not necessarily equivalent to goodness. Qualities like honesty, philanthropy, or resistance to superstition do not always carry a selective advantage. And after billions of years of evolution, here we are.

@Flyingsaucesir Fitness isn’t necessarily yes/no but a matter of how many descendants result versus other conspecifics.

In smaller groups the traits passed to descendants become more based on intergenerational shuffling of the deck or sampling representation than being beneficial or detrimental. If people with a tendency to polydactyly just happen to be amongst a remnant population, polydactyly will become more common in future generations without much to say for that trait being related strongly to fitness.

Some behavioral quirks, such as religion, could result from having a larger brain that facilitates baseless speculation. One can see patterns that don’t exist in the way presumed and such superstition can become popular for arbitrary reasons, such as carriers being more gregarious or influential over a group.

@Scott321 Right, it's complicated. To the extent that any behavior is genetically-based, it is almost certainly the result of the expression of many genes in concert; the term biologists use is "polygenic traits." And then there is the effect that environmental conditions can have on the expression of genes, the study of which is a field called "epigenetics." It sounds like you have a pretty good grasp of the situation, and I'm not telling you anything you don't already know. I'm glad you steered the conversation in this direction. It's essential to recognize the complexity here. There are no simple answers.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:660797
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.