Agnostic.com

1 3

To Have or To Be? and The Art of Being
In the mid-1970s, twenty years after his influential treatise on the art of loving and four decades after legendary anthropologist Margaret Mead turned to him for difficult advice, Fromm became interested in the most basic, most challenging art of human life — the art of being. At the height of a new era that had begun prioritizing products over people and consumption over creativity, Fromm penned a short, potent book titled To Have or To Be? — an inquiry into how the great promise of progress, seeded by the Industrial Revolution, failed us in our most elemental search for meaning and well-being. But the question proved far too complex to tackle in a single volume, so Fromm left out a significant portion of his manuscript. Those pages, in many ways even richer and more insightful than the original book, were later published as The Art of Being — a sort of field guide, all the timelier today, to how we can shift from the having mode of existence, which is systematically syphoning our happiness, to a being mode.
[themarginalian.org]

KateOahu 8 June 11
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

It's not looking like that will happen. Just sayin'.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:671142
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.