Agnostic.com

8 12

LINK Despite Supreme Court win, Bremerton's praying football coach is long gone

Joseph Kennedy, the showboating Christian coach who led performative prayers at midfield after Bremerton High School football games, spent years demanding his old job back, and took his case all the way up to the Supreme Court… Yet now that he has the opportunity to work with the team again, he’s nowhere to be found, according to a column in the Seattle Times.

All of this was predictable. Before the Supreme Court issued its awful ruling in Kennedy v. Bremerton, a group of atheists argued that the entire case ought to be tossed out before the justices could weigh in on the merits.

An amicus brief filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, the Center for Inquiry, the American Humanist Association, and the Secular Coalition for America made the argument that the case was moot because Joseph Kennedy wouldn’t even benefit from a victory.

Kennedy had argued that he lost his job because he wanted to deliver a quiet Christian prayer at midfield after games, but he was persecuted because of that. All of that was exaggerated or untrue. He was never actually fired. The prayers weren’t “quiet.” And the concern was far more about the coercive nature of his performative prayers, not his ability to privately pray. But the only reason the Bremerton case was in front of the Supreme Court at all was because, theoretically, their decision was the only way Kennedy could regain his job.

The atheists argued the case was moot because a ruling in Kennedy’s favor wouldn’t change his situation… largely because Kennedy had already packed up, moved far away from Bremerton (Washington), and was never seriously going to become a football coach there again.

snytiger6 9 Sep 18
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

Just using the courts to be a complete douche canoe and force everyone to watch his Bullsnot.

4

A piece of fuckin’ human waste.

5

A big waste of time for all parties. He should be fined for all that wasted time and effort.

4

It's a very bad precedent. However this Court has demonstrated that it does not respect precedent, so it does not have to hew to it.

4

Typical obstructionist regressive Fascists republicans whose only goal is too remove all the rights and beliefs at any cost of those who do not support them!!!

3

Another ridiculous decision by a badly corrupted court. If we manage to survive, this corruption will continue to be exposed and the corrupting entities brought down. In my dreams...

6

I read that. The dick is making money from the cons. AND, the prick wasn't fired - the claim that SCROTUS heard dozens of times - he was placed on paid leave. At least now they can fire him for not working.

8

What happens when you have a rigged court. Law goes out the window and patronage and beliefs come to be the deciding factors, much like the Trump case in Florida.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:687258
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.