Agnostic.com

4 0

Is it ever right to believe in a God before examining that God for logical coherency?

Do we dare question the character and actions of a proposed God before accepting that proposed God as real?

[sufficientreasons.wordpress.com]

#god
PhilStilwell 6 Oct 7
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

To what degree do humans prevent themselves from considering possibilities that are emotionally unpalatable?

Something unpalatable to one person is a delicacy to another. The idea of child rape is, to say the least, emotionally inedible to me, but to a child rapist, it's a luscious treat.

0

Well, you answer your question in your question. If testable evidence can be provided for something supernatural, it is no longer supernatural and by extension no longer a god. According to the evidence at hand, the possibility for there being anything supernatural is zero, which includes gods, angels, leprechauns, etc.

0

Blinded by faith and belief. Just like falling in love - whether it's wrong or right, against all odds

1

I don't think there is ever a reason to believe in a god, until sufficient evidence is given for that god's existence. I think you have to establish it's existence first before you even start to question it's character or actions? I can believe that I will have a child, but until I have one, why would I question this imaginary child's non-existent character or actions?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:919
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.