Agnostic.com
8 5

I have a theory that maximum intimacy between two people requires both people to have the same "approach" to problem-solving. e.g., in the Meyers Briggs model, some people are conceptual thinkers, some are conceptual feelers, some are concrete thinkers, others are concrete feelers. I have no idea if the meyers briggs model is right.. but my theory is a mismatched pair can only hope to obtain what I'll call a "mutual respect / acceptance level of intimacy", which is a far cry from the full intimacy that a matched pair can obtain. Not a psychologist... just a guy with a theory. Now go beat it up!

ReasonRising 2 June 22
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I’m INFJ, and I depend so much on how I feel to make decisions (I do use some empirical evidence, just ‘not enough’, I’ve been told). I feel pretty rational, but then, I would<g>. Drives some folks insane. Especially logical thinkers. Ever seen a grown man tear out his hair, lol?! That was my ex. ?

Respectfully, that could have been more about him than about you.

@josephr I’m smiling, because everything was about him?...but not anymore.

@CarolinaGirl60 Good for you. Getting rid of one's emotional vultures is healthy and freeing.

0

Of course!

tryingcake Level 7 June 23, 2018
1

He science behind Meyers-Briggs is sketch because there is none.

Communication about how you think and the willingness to try to figure out and accommodate needs is probably a better approach.

Amber Level 4 June 23, 2018
1

I think there is truth to 'opposites attract.' Sometimes our own personality traits can annoy us when we see it in others.

Hihi Level 6 June 23, 2018
0

Too bad it's not so clear cut or definitive. Self-analysing tests like Myers Briggs are guidelines only, and coupled with in-depth, self-reflection, the results can help people self-actualise, whatever that means for the individual.

There's no way one can accurately put people into any box based on observed personality traits or test results, especially potential love partners. Here's a good article which touches on the subject in more depth.

[psychologytoday.com]

josephr Level 7 June 23, 2018
1

How would you ever test your theory? To build the highest levels of intimacy requires some time and effort, how many people are you going to be able to develop that kind of intimacy with? Your approach would start with knowing where are the Meyers Briggs you both are. It's not like I've got men lined up waiting to start a relationship to have us both compare Meyers Briggs scores. I know I need a new approach because obviously what I'm doing isn't working but I can't figure out how to implement this.

2

My late partner and I were probably on opposite parts of this test (she never took it ). I was introverted and she was an extreme extrovert. We had opposite ideas about problem solving because of our personalities. She was a super quick thinker and wanted to solve problems 'now' and I took awhile. However, I doubt any two people could be more intimate than the two of us. I think if I were to retake the test it would have changed because of her. We can and often do influence others personalities.

JackPedigo Level 9 June 23, 2018
0

How are you defining "intimate?"

Write Comment

Recent Visitors 67

Photos 164 More

Posted by UnitySomeday my princess will appear before me. ❤️

Posted by AtheistPeace666Hello I'm a single Canuck looking for my special lady Canuck.

Posted by KhaCRYou ever feel like you found the perfect sexual partner then he turns out to be a complete 💩bag and you can’t find the satisfaction in other encounters?

Posted by EntheogenFanI have a story to tell.

Posted by EntheogenFanI have a story to tell.

Posted by KateOahuYes, I agree that the reverse is also true.

Posted by JolantaThis is what women have to put up with and then they want to be intimate while we are still angry because they will not do their share of housework.

Posted by JolantaDucky, Snookums....

Posted by SorchaThis is a guy I was talking to from okcupid. He is totally new to online dating and it shows.

Posted by JolantaThat’s Amore. Some women are just far too shallow.

Posted by JolantaSomething for real intimacy perhaps.

Posted by Green_Soldier71Has anyone here had any experience with (or known someone who has/had) a SEXLESS MARRIAGE/RELATIONSHIP or a FRIGID PARTNER?

Posted by EyesThatSmileNakedness.

Posted by LetzGetRealMy family has often commented how I should become a "cougar"... as I look pretty good at my age and have a younger mindset than some of my peers, I guess this is there rationale?

Posted by Ann-1980The 4 types of Intimacy to feel sufficient, satisfied & healing in a love relationship.

Posted by Philip21over the top thinking? [agnostic.com]

  • Top tags#relationship #sex #intimacy #video #friends #religious #hope #religion #world #god #children #wife #marriage #book #kids #advice #death #reason #agnostic #beliefs #Atheist #hell #money #society #movies #fear #hello #Present #parents #belief #loves #Song #community #lonely #books #divorce #culture #humans #dogs #sleep #chemistry #Christian #college #soul #animals #sexy #philosophy #holiday #DonaldTrump #sexuality ...

    Members 1,849Top

    Moderator