Agnostic.com
7 2

Would the Corona virus be more survivable if you were injected with live virus blood serum? Instead of being infected thru respiratory tract.

OleBlueEyes 5 Apr 3
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I get infected tomorrow or 6 months from now and I have to go on a ventilator I am screwed probably.

4

So far, there's no evidence that covid-19 can circulate and infect other organs via the blood. It enters through binding sites primarily in the lungs, but also in the GI-tract. If injected intravenously, it will propably get cleared quickly and amount to nothing.

What you're loosely describing is actually a vaccine: exposing the immune system to a compromised version of the enemy (e.g. a live-attenuated one, a dead one or even fragments of it) so that the immune system can safely learn to quickly identify it and kill it. It doesn't have to be a live virus. Remember, our goal is to "condition" our B-cells, the cells that produce antibodies, without risking an actual infection.

What our immune system will ultimately "see" is an antigen. Any succeeding condact with that specific antigen will prompt a quicker and larger response rendering us less susceptible to an infection.

That being said, vaccines are usually injected into muscle instead of directly into the blood stream and there are several reasons for this:

  • Our antigen-presenting cells (surveillant cells that engulf and present our B-cells with an antigen) reside in tissue, where pathogens are more likely to enter (skin, mucosa, muscle). We basically want to inject the antigen where it's more likely to be found by the "right" cells.

  • Also keep in mind that vaccines don't only contain antigens. Additional substances are required for stability, as well as to boost the immune response. In our blood stream, these substances would likely break away, rendering the vaccine less effective. Injecting it in tissue instead ensures it will remain intact so that all the ingredients can work together for optimal effect. It also ensures a lengthier interraction between the immune system and the antigen. We want vaccines to linger a bit, which is unlikely to happen in the blood.

RaniaLian Level 4 Apr 6, 2020
1

2/3 patients die on the ventilators, don’t like those odds.

I wonder if anyone has tried ventilating with breathing fluid (perfluorocarbons, PFCs) for Covid-19 yet.
@RaniaLian

@bingst I couldn't find any info in regards to that and COVID-19 so propably not. In general, liquid ventilation has shown promising results in animal models, however it does not seem to improve the outcome in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) when compared with conventional mechanical ventilation.

Meanwhile, the use of conventional mechanical ventilation is being re-evaluated in the treatment of COVID-19, depending on whether a patient presents with ARDS (thus requiring the support of high-pressure ventilation) or atypically (in atypical cases, non-invasive options such as high flow nasal cannula, CPAP etc might suffice).

In ARDS, areas of the lung are “closed” due to:

  • an accumulation of fluid. Unlike what happens with PFCs, this fluid is poor in oxygen and leaves nothing to be picked up by the blood. The lungs try to mitigate this by constricting the blood vessels in those poorly-oxygenated areas, diverting the blood flow to other areas of the lungs that are better oxygenated (this phenomenon is called hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction). In contrast, COVID-19 usually involves a dry lung and disrupted hypoxic vasoconstriction. This lack of regulation via vasoconstriction might explain a low oxygen saturation in the setting of fluid-free lungs.
  • reduced compliance (think of compliance as the capacity of the lungs to expand). This leads to a decreased amount of gass inside the lungs: mechanical ventilation can help recruit (open up) parts of the lung. In many COVID-19 cases, however, there seems to be normal compliance (hence a normal amount of gass inside the lungs), minimizing the need for recruitment and rendering mechanical ventilation less effective.

Accroding to an editorial authored by prof. L. Gattinoni, the majority of covid-19 cases with lung involvement start out atypically. It should be noted, though, that some COVID-19 patients might transition from atypical presentations to text-book ARDS (in fact, 20-30% of patients in this citation developed ARDS), further emphasizing the need for a personalized approach to ventilation. [esicm.org]

Hopefully I didn't go too much on a tangent ^^

@RaniaLian What do you think about PFCs doped with a vasodilator? Or some other medicine that would help with gas exchange? It just seems to me that PFCs would be much better at delivering medicines to the tissues in a more consistent manner. I also wonder about any clearing out effect it might have, given its viscosity.

And I appreciate the level of detail. It's why I tagged you.

@bingst
“It just seems to me that PFCs would be much better at delivering medicines to the tissues in a more consistent manner.”

I think that’s a reasonable assumption. About 20% of a medicine’s concentration can be lost during inhalation and further reduced in areas of the lungs where there’s mucus, inflammation or collapse. In addition, data from preliminary animal studies suggest that the uptake of antibiotics by the lungs and the efficacy of vasoactive drugs is increased during liquid ventilation as compared to intravenous administration.

Even on their own, PFCs open up collapsed alveoli and have anti-inflammatory effects (removal of inflammatory cells and their mediators). As you mentioned, they can indeed drive the removal of infectious and inflammatory debris from the lungs. Unlike saline, PFCs do so without interfering substantially with the function of surfactant, the substance produced by the lungs to reduce surface tension. However, their high viscosity can be problematic (e.g. difficulties in flow).
Despite these theoretical advantages, studies so far have been disappointing and more research is required to figure out the optimal use of liquid ventilation. So far, liquid ventilation has been tried clinically without additional drugs inside the medium. Even though PFCs are poor solvents for most biological compounds, gasses such as nitric oxide, a vasodialator, are soluble in PFCs and could be administered as you have suggested. As a side note, the impaired hypoxic vasoconstriction observed in some COVID-19 patients with dry lungs could be exacerbated by drug-induced vasodialation, which would lead to even more blood flowing through poorly oxygenated areas.

Less soluble compounds can also be "loaded" into PFCs using different processes which depend on the properties of each indivitual drug. For example, water soluble drugs can be incorporated in PFCs through a process of emulcification. PFCs are hydrophobic (they don’t mix well with water) so the drug would first have to be dissolved in water, then added to the PFCs and dispersed via the application of sound waves. If you want to read more, here’s an interesting article that I found on the subject [engineering.cmu.edu]
Other systems (drug-in-fluorocarbon suspensions, oil-in-fluorocarbon emulsions etc) are being investigated as well.

@RaniaLian You are super! I've been interested in treating pulmonary ailments with PFCs since 1996, when I first thought of it. I check from time to time to see if much has been done with them, but it seems not much has.

@bingst It truly is an interesting subject which I knew next to nothing about (so naturally I fell down a rabbit hole 😅). I had fun looking into different sources, thanks for the tag!

0

I bet somebody has done it to preempt respiratory infection.

1

Definitely NOT a live/living virus injected into the body via the bloodstream, that would be almost akin to Lethal Injections for Executions.
But an attenuated ( dead) form of the virus would possibly work as the same is done with most Flu Vaccines anyway.

Triphid Level 9 Apr 3, 2020

I don't think that's whole virus though, is it? But just enough of it to prompt an immune response?

@bingst No, it is an attentuated form of the living virus, i.e. a dead virus.
The body's Immune system then recognise the genetic material from the attentuated virus and goes about creating the necessary Anti-bodiesin response.

You are saying it would be as bad a big syringe of potassium chloride that stops your heart immediately?

You are saying it would as bad as a large syringe of concentrated potassium chloride which stops your heart almost immediately?

@OleBlueEyes No not quite as quick and lethal but using a 100% a live virus in any vaccine would be counter-productive and potentially fatal at the very least.

0

I was wondering something similar last night, but an injection just under the skin. I think injecting live virus into the bloodstream would simply carry it quickly to the lungs, before any antibodies could be formed.

By March 14th I was wondering about systematically, preemptively, and incrementally infecting essential personnel and putting them in quarantine, hospitalizing them as needed. Had that been done, most of the first round would be coming out now, presumably immune.

bingst Level 8 Apr 3, 2020

You think the virus knows to go to lungs?

And kill 1-3 percent ?

@OleBlueEyes As I understand it, the virus attaches to receptors, in the lung tissues. I'm assuming that once in the bloodstream, it will be carried eventually to the lungs, but on the blood side of the alveoli, as opposed to the air side. Although, I'm not entirely sure the receptors are on both sides of the alveoli.

@OleBlueEyes Since the virus is mostly passed on from host to host via airborne droplets from coughing and sneezing and the next host usually breathes them in, then it goes directly to the lungs via the trachea, the Bronchi and into the alveloi.

@OleBlueEyes I don't think any virus actually thinks as we would see it, it is merely is driven by the need/urge to find host cells so it can use the DNA and nutrients in those host cells to replicate itself, usually in the range of thousands of times in one single host cell.

@bingst are these receptors specific to lung cells only?

@OleBlueEyes Good question. I don't know. I am however assuming that the receptors are absent in any other part of the respiratory tract, which indicates that they could be unique to the lungs.

@OleBlueEyes No, the 'receptors' are specific, for want of a better term, to finding ANY non infected host cells in the body the virus infects.
But being an air-borne virus it IS drawn into the airways of the victim as it breathes, it can ALSO enter the body by tranferance from the skin into the mucosal layers around the eyes, mouth and nosal passages.

2

Why would you ask that?

Here's by far the most informative data site. Each graph is interactive; click "Linear" or "log" to get different views. Slide your cursor on the blue bars below the graph...

...and don't forget to wash your hands..this one is more contagious than measles.

scariest chart? Hospital beds per 1,000 people vs. GDP per capita, 2009.

[ourworldindata.org]

When you can`t breath, you got 3 minutes, to gain immunity without dying as often as respiratory infection of covid19.

@OleBlueEyes Unrealistic. I think you've been watching too many of these;

Write Comment

Recent Visitors 34

Photos 136 More

Posted by racocn8I saw some articles on meteorite composition and ended up with this picture.

Posted by racocn8Here are some photos of eggs deposited on the underside of leaves.

Posted by racocn8Here are some photos of eggs deposited on the underside of leaves.

Posted by racocn8Here are some photos of eggs deposited on the underside of leaves.

Posted by racocn8Here are some photos of eggs deposited on the underside of leaves.

Posted by racocn8Here are some photos of eggs deposited on the underside of leaves.

Posted by Slava3That makes me nervous

Posted by Slava3So we are part of a Cosmic ecosystem?

Posted by SergeTafCamNot too long ago I had the opportunity to take a couple of pictures of a peacock's feather.

Posted by SergeTafCamNot too long ago I had the opportunity to take a couple of pictures of a peacock's feather.

Posted by SergeTafCamWhat's your favorite color?

Posted by SergeTafCamWhat's your favorite color?

Posted by SergeTafCamWhat's your favorite color?

Posted by SergeTafCamWhat's your favorite color?

Posted by SergeTafCamWhat's your favorite color?

Posted by SergeTafCamExciting times.

  • Top tags#video #world #religion #religious #youtube #scientific #god #physics #evidence #earth #hope #solar #nuclear #friends #technology #humans #cosmic #book #quantum #reason #evolution #faith #truth #belief #books #relationship #NASA #laws #stars #Cosmos #money #community #believer #atheism #Atheist #astronomy #beliefs #Texas #environment #biology #media #teach #prayer #church #divorce #TheTruth #politics #agnostic #planets #kids ...

    Members 304Top

    Moderator