Agnostic.com

2 4

Does religion as such lead to enmity and violence?

Many are firmly convinced that religions are the greatest obstacle to peaceful and prosperous coexistence among people.
I do not think the religions as such are the problem. In my opinion, the greatest obstacle are the "Coalitional intuitions" or "tribal instincts", i.e. the mental differentiation deeply rooted in our minds: WE (the good and pure ones), vs. THEM (the bad/impure ones).

Some have posed the question whether these "tribal instincts" are 'hardwired' or not. However one answers this question, the fact is that they are ubiquitous, whether latent or manifest; that they can be suppressed or domesticated but not eradicated; that they can easily be triggered even on trivial occasions, and then often do great damage.

The thesis is: Shiites and Sunnis (to name but one current example) could live peacefully together if they were only separated by their different faiths ; if there were not the tribal instincts that are hijacked by the respective faiths.

That is why it is so important not to give these instincts any room, why we have to constantly monitor them, to expose their toxic effects wherever they appear.

If the tribal instincts are contained and held at bay, people with different religions can live peacefully side by side

Matias 8 June 25
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Interesting thesis.

0

I agree, basically. It's hard to tease apart chicken-and-egg questions like this.

Even wars that have a large surface component of religious issues, have so many influences in the mix, including Machiavellian manipulators who are just using religion as a fulcrum of influence, that it's actually hard to make the case that a particular conflict would not have happened had religion not been in the mix. I think a majority of my fellow unbelievers try to stake a claim that's not supported by evidence in this regard.

A claim that I do make is that religion is easy to manipulate and makes it easier to manipulate people apart from religious ideology because it softens them up and makes them easy for fact-free button-pushing. So I'm not saying we wouldn't be better off without religion stirring the pot, I just think other ways would be found to stir it, to a (largely unknown) extent.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:115378
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.