Agnostic.com

2 3

In openly ostracizing certain behaviors deemed (rightly so) unacceptable, do not fail to remember those actions that were maybe even more condemnable that were largely given a pass because it was claimed "they have a good reason" (if the matter was even discussed in the first place). If the litmus test is having committed acts resulting in great harm to the innocent, the list is quite long, and the offenses quite grave, by those who are still accepted into polite society.

WilliamCharles 8 June 25
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

It is wrong to go to their level of action and throw sanders out of a rest.

Marine Level 8 June 26, 2018

I don't really have a problem with it. Not much different than refusing to bake a cake for a gay couple, no?

2

"I am so bloody sick of the claim that the slaughter of innocent people by bringing down the full force of modern weaponry from every possible direction to mangle their flesh in the most horrific and violent ways is not monstrous because [we have a good reason]."

~ LanceThruster

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:115677
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.