Agnostic.com

5 0

What do people think about this video. I know this information has been out there a long time, but it's an interesting version.

AmmaRE007 7 Nov 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Let's see now... we've mastered space travel and genetic engineering, but the most sophisticated means of recording our knowledge is to make impressions on clay tablets... Hmmm.

skado Level 9 Nov 27, 2018

good point

1
1

This is pathetic. It takes a bunch of ancient mythical stories and tries to treat them as if they actually happened and are true historical events. That is just one way in which religions start. They got a lot of things wrong. For instance there ONLY a single reference to Atlantis, in a story told by Plato. There is no other reference source for it anywhere as havingt been an actual place that existed. The Sumerians wrote on clay tablets, but their survival was by accident, while in the video they imply it was intentional.. A large fire baked the clay tablets makign them durable enough to survive, but it was not intentional to creae records preserved though the ages. Most of what has been preserved are ledgers and inventories of merchants.. They did not think thery would need to preserve records past one person's lifetime.

The entire video is nto takign facts and figurign things out, but rather having a fully formed theory and looking to try to cobble facts to match the theory. That is not how good science or research is done.

The actual evidence shows that most abandoned ancient cities had outgrown their local resources, and in some cases thr alteration of the environment, liek buildign a city where a huhgle once stood, altered rain fall patters. in the end either through famine, drought or sickness (such as cholera), the cities were abandoned.

Yes, some technologies do get lost. You can look at some of the concrete structure built just after the great depression, and peopel who work with concrete today can't tell you how they built them. It was presumed the technology did nto need to be preserved. So we have structures which are great pieces of art and nobody knows how to recreate it. There was no disaster, other tha the craftsmen who knew how to do it all died. It was something you learned by doing instead of learning it by redign books, so it was lost.

The only real legitimate concern about the abandoned ancient cities, is that before when peopel fouled their environment they just moved a couple valleys over. Today, we are fouling up the environment of the entire world, but we wont' have any p0lace not fouled up to go to.

I've heard about the concrete, how we haven't learned how to imake it as of yet. It also makes sense what your saying about the Sumerians, I had n't realized that the tablets were actually ledgers and inventory.
It does appear that they are trying to piece meal the theory together. Thanks for the comments

@AmmaRE007 I shoudl be clear. The sumarian tablets were mostly ledgers and inventories and trade related. There may ve some stoies, but it would be a very small percentage of the preserved tablets.

In every known culture to date, the beginings of writing had to do trade, so mos tearly writing of most cultures are just inventories and ledgers. After that woudl come records of rulers, which becomes histories, but often records of rulers are exaggerated to make a ruler seem better than they really were. A prime example would be King David from the old testament, which makes him out ot be a gret king, but records from other regions make him out to just be a minor war lord. (BTW, David is the earliest character of the bible that can be confirmed as having been based on an actual person.)

Anyway, for most cultures, literature and philosophy requies the development of a sizable (lierate) middle class. Until then Minstrels are usually the story tellers, and they hve in most cases been illiterate and just memorized stories and songs, often adding their own little touches or twists to make it their own. When a society becomes literate, scribs willoften make changes to stories to put their own mark on them too.

1

Lose the first minute and it’ll be easier to accept and on here your going to get a lot pushback from those who seem to not believe in anything.

But when you have several societies that have never come into contact with one another that believe that we are the results of alien intervention as well as identifying that they all came from the same place and the even bigger piece of evidence being that even though all of these societies spoke a different language they all referred to our creators as the anunnaki.

The RH factor is a unique case because there’s people are like no it’s all stupid but yet at least 5 different governments are investigating the RH property’s source.
But anyway thanks for sharing there’s a lot more information about these subjects as well as explaining other possibilities in regards to our past.

All ancient people's do seem to have drawings of visitors.. or spacecrafts.. and things that can only be seen from great heights. Lots of questions are not answered.

@AmmaRE007 Very true and personally I’m confident that there will be an undeniable discovery within the next decade or so. But we’ll see

1

What a bunch of woo.
Give my regards to L. Ron Hubbard and Joseph Smith

did you watch the video? i was interested in those that actually watched it

@AmmaRE007
I watched it. I have heard and read this "theory" before. There is no evidence for this Annunakki. There is evidence for forgotten technology which had to be rediscovered, but there were no Alien gold mines! How the fuck is Alien DNA from light years away going to be a match with Human? Annunakki woman carries Adam?!?
I call bullshit.
Lost technology has nothing to do with Alien tinkering.
And to suggest that there was a worldwide flood....really?
You Alien guys are not much different from the Creationists!

But you can actually prove that it’s actually nothing but woo right? Because if you actually have the evidence then please share and I’ll actually look at it.

@Alshaytan
There is no evidence of Alien visitation, either in the fossil record, recorded history or in genetics. None.
All you have is circumstancial evidence pointing toward reinvention and nothing more
Everything else is just woo.

@Leafhead actually there is in recorded history it’s the story of the Sumerian who were the first to actually document their history and as well in many cultures that various parts of the world. Their language might predate Latin as well as describing something that they didn’t actually have words for so there’s been a loss in translation.

We’re discovering something new about DNA almost daily so until we have answered everything about it then we can’t say whether it’s there or not it would be pure speculation. And finally if there’s no such thing then why does every major government have documented evidence of things that aren’t from this planet being seen here on this planet.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:232382
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.