Agnostic.com

3 1

In finding a partner how much did the ‘Key into the lock’ principle operate for you or should operate for all couples? i.e. If you admitted to a weakness then you look for someone of strengths in that area and vice versa. There are obvious physical examples of this like looking for someone with a womb, but there are other physical considerations like those of Jack Sprat and his wife. What about others - emotional, cultural, religious? Are there any other principles besides “ Sheer compatibility” that operate. NB I have not looked for a partner for quite a few years and have no plans to do so but have been thinking about the foundations of my relationships e.g I knew my wife would be good with young children because she was a young age (kindergarten) teacher whilst I was a higher school teacher.

Mcflewster 8 Dec 13
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I think you're talking about what I refer to as complements.

0

I pay more attention to avoiding the qualities that were problematic in previous relationships.

UUNJ Level 8 Dec 13, 2018
0

It's hard enough trying to find someone with mutual chemistry , without adding in a huge wish list.

I am sorry I did not wish to complicate anything. My motivation behind this post is the fact that religions and their Churches have done little to stop the tide of divorces and countless painful pre-marriage attempts at finding the perfect partner. I wonder what dating agencies use as their principles for finding a match? Anyone work for one?

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:243094
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.