Agnostic.com

1 0

SCOTUS declines to hear NJ case of grant money going to churches.

[msn.com]

A lower court ruled that NJ violated a constitutional prohibition when it gave thousands of historic preservation dollars to churches.

I'm torn about this ruling.

As an atheist, I'm glad no public monies are going to churches.

As a historic preservationist, I'm sad--many of these old churches are magnificent in their architecture and furnishings, and losing them means losing significant history, both in terms of design and in terms of development of the community.

Elganned 8 Mar 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Like it or not there are a great deal of churches that do hold a strong historical value in America and in ways that weren’t faith based.

Several meetings were held in churches in regards to the events that led to our revolutionary war.
There are numerous churches that were vital to the success of the Underground Railroad as well as where historical speeches were made during the civil rights movement.

So we let our bias get in the way of history or we can just appreciate the fact that at least during certain times in our history the church actually did something.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:303326
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.