Agnostic.com

8 6

The Do No Harm Act (H.R. 1450, S. 593) is a bill that would limit the negative impact of religious exemptions in federal law in areas such as civil rights and health care coverage.

We need your help to build support for this important legislation. Please ask your Congressperson and Senators to support this bill!

Read the rest by clicking below.
[atheists.org]

AtheistNews 6 Mar 6
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

6

We do need to take action on this. The religious right wants to make it a crime not to believe. We need to be equal under the law without the thought police involved.We do not need anyone to have special privileges.We all need the same healthcare and are all the same citizens.

3

I have already signed the petition to my legislators. Yes, we do need to counter the slimy creep of religion in our secular system.

0

Think Do Not Harm would help climate change action? That's worldwide.

0

Thank you for this information. I've sent letters to my Texas representatives, for all the good it will do me..... At least they know people are paying attention to what is going on.

0

Everyone is to be treated as equals. However, through various pieces of legislation, including charitable choice, religion is more than creeping into society, it is trampling on it. I signed!

[ssir.org]
Please note that in part 2 of this it discusses the amount that religious organizations utilize from their own coffers. This is misleading as there is a great amount of tax dollars being funnelled through various charities. Though it states that this is done without bias-this is not what I have found. Note also
First amendment analysis.
[washingtontimes.com]
Please note the end with regard to secular implementation of services!
An interesting read regarding skirting the courts.
[nytimes.com]

1

I went to the gov site: [congress.gov] to look up H.R> 1450. There is no text for this bill -- the athesits.org is commenting on nothing but a title which could end up meaning nothing. It is a good idea to continue to check on this item and see what it really is about.

That is because the Do No Harm Act is simply being reintroduced. It has already had a full text written about this bill and there isn't supposed to be any changes. I don't even think there can be any changes when a bill is reintroduced but if there are I'm sure those changes will be scrutinized when the new text is complete.
[govtrack.us]

@AtheistNews A bill that does not survive doesn't have to be exact if it is reintroduced in the next session. You key flaws are 'there isn't supposed' and "I'm sure". With the government there is no such thing as a sure thing.

@xyz123
So if I would have said " there will not be any changes" and " they will scrutinize any changes" that would have been better? Sorry, but how I said that was deliberate and wasn't a flaw.
Also when I said "I'm sure those changes will be scrutinized" I was talking about any supporter, not just the politicians or the government in general.

@AtheistNews As you wish: I will wait until the text is written. Good luck to you.

0

Here is a short article about its reintroduction.
[nbcnews.com]

0

Personally, I think the wording is an improvement. The intent of the bill is the same as the older one but it adds some clarification to the wording of it.

H.R. 1450
It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 should not be interpreted to authorize an exemption from generally applicable law that imposes the religious views, habits, or practices of one party upon another;

(2) the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 should not be interpreted to authorize an exemption from generally applicable law that imposes meaningful harm, including dignitary harm, on a third party; and

(3) the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 should not be interpreted to authorize an exemption that permits discrimination against other persons, including persons who do not belong to the religion or adhere to the beliefs of those to whom the exemption is given.

This section is almost exactly that same as the older bill.
Section 3 of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb–1) is amended by adding at the end the following:

🍸 Additional exception from application of Act where Federal law prevents harm to others.—This section does not apply—

“(1) to any provision of law or its implementation that provides for or requires—

“(A) protections against discrimination or the promotion of equal opportunity including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, Executive Order 11246, the Violence Against Women Act, and Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity (77 FR 5662);

🍺 employers to provide wages, other compensation, or benefits including leave, or standards protecting collective activity in the workplace;

☕ protections against child labor, abuse, or exploitation; or

🍸 access to, information about, referrals for, provision of, or coverage for, any health care item or service;

“(2) to any term requiring goods, services, functions, or activities to be performed or provided to beneficiaries of a government contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or other award; or

“(3) to the extent that application would result in denying a person the full and equal enjoyment of a good, service, benefit, facility, privilege, advantage, or accommodation, provided by the government.”.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:305006
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.