Agnostic.com

15 5

BREAKING NEWS - White Supremist was the perpertrator of the shooting of 2 children and one 20 year old at the Garlic Festival!!!!!! What is Trump going to say now??!!!!

[yahoo.com]

sassygirl3869 9 July 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

15 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Probably going to lash out at garlic-lovers, "they deserved it"

1

Not a thing.

2

Nothing. He will stay mute, beside offering prayers. After all, there are good people on both sides.

Except, according to the prez, ANTIFA.

2

His supporters will all be saying too bad there wasn't a good guy with a gun to stop him. Trump may actually mimic the same line.

2

Am guessing the stupid shooter didn't like that Gilroy's population is more than half hispanic and latino.

1

Some Bullshit lie

bobwjr Level 10 July 29, 2019
3

They will put all anti-fascist groups on a terrorist watch list. Any more questions?

2

The shooter is now dead...he forfeited his own life...he wasted his own life.

2

Always knew that eating garlic was antisocial - just shows how drastic the reaction can be

Shouldn’t laugh, but this is funny! 🤣

5

I see it's no longer America the beautiful ,but now is America,whete you can be shot by a racist,paranoin piece of shit who will then be defended by idiots proclaiming his right to purchase a weapon unfettered by any reasonable gun control laws😨

3

tRump won't say a word ❌

5

He will deflect by attacking another person of color or city that didn't vote for him, or country that has made fun of him. The man has no empathy or actual feelings other than self love and thin skin when it comes to himself.

5

I'm not surprised. An angry racist Neo-Nazi.

Why the hell did he kill children? Heartbreaking.

America desperately need to tighten up gun laws and do extensive background checks. No civilians should be able to buy assault weapons.

AGREE

@sassygirl3869 @LiteralHiker the only use for an assault rifle is to rapidly clear (kill or severely injure)a lot of people in a confined area - they have no use in any civilian situation. but California already has some of the most stringent gun laws across USA - did he break the gun ownership laws or are they inadequate?

@ShadowAmicus he bought the gun in Nevada 3 weeks ago

@sassygirl3869 The USA has a totally screwed up system of armaments ownership that will only be fixed when politicians are pressured into change by the public - no sign of overwhelming pressure yet

@ShadowAmicus

He bought an assault rifle in Nevada and illegally smuggled it into California.

@LiterateHiker by smuggled, do you mean drove along an open road with no checks?

@ShadowAmicus

Perhaps "smuggled" is too strong a word. The shooter bought the assault weapon in Nevada, the brought it illegally into California where they are banned.

@LiterateHiker makes it obvious that state based legislation on gunsis ineffective and needs centralised decisions

@ShadowAmicus, this is the problem in a nut shell! Any weapons or accessories (high capacity magazines, bump stocks, laser sights) have to be banned nationally to be effective. Cities like New York, Chicago etc. have strong gun laws, but because gun access is just a short drive away to a nearby state or sometimes just outside the city, they are highly ineffective. Which of course the NRA is fond of pointing out.
The second problem is that there is such a glut of these weapons and accessories already out there in the hands of people who are borderline schizophrenic, any kind of ban at this point would take decades to actually make a dent in the killing sprees. But throwing your hands up and doing nothing, as promoted by gunaholics is not an answer either.
Having drivers licenses, regulations and DUI laws does not stop people from driving illegal, stupid and drunk, but I don’t recall people saying all these regulations should be eliminated! The most common response to this by gunaholics is that unlike the Second Amendment, there are no Constitutional guarantees to transportation. Given the odd, conservative, interpretation of the Second Amendment, which completely negated the “militia” wording, I’m guessing a clause could be found to deny driving laws as well, but that’s an argument for another time.

1

A bunch of lies and racist remarks. Maybe something to cover his ass.

2

Not surprising but very sad.

Our country is going to shithole status.

@sassygirl3869 Don't worry at the present rate we only have less than a hundred years to go.

@dalefvictor not funny.

@sassygirl3869 I do not mean for this to be funny.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:380903
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.