Some years back Victoria belatedly had a review of it Bill of Rights Act. I sent 3 copies of my submission, one through the local member, one email and one registered mail. None ever seemed to arrive or appear in Hansard and the blatant failures of Victorian Rights practice were never discussed.
I proved to the Victorian Ombudsman's Office that his representative had not exercised due diligence to arrive at his erroneous dismissal of my complaint against a local Victorian council. - His response - if you do not like my finding then you can complain again.
Imagine my chagrin when 7 or so years later I found the same man was dealing with another complaint of mine on another matter.
I have had similar problems with health ombudsmen after a dentist's drill blew off the air hose to rocket into my mouth and then bounce on the floor. The dri) could have gone down my throat or shot out the side of my neck leaving me looking like Frankenstein waiting for the electrical connection. Verbal statements were denied, systemic errors in procedures and dental training were not admitted (effective gaslighting), records were suppressed/ lost/never recorded, complaints procedure was not to benefit the patient but curry information to use in rebuttal of events. Ie. The complaint procedure was a complete fraud.

Also down here in Victoria they have an ugly habit of labelling you as a queralent - [parliament.vic.gov.au]

An acquaintance had the Stawell Council CEO pull that one on her. That CEO in typical fashion was bumped up and I think is now the CEO of Ballarat. The police also noted on her file that she was insane - this observation made because she is profoundly deaf. . . More evidence of the effectiveness of the Victorian Bill of Rights.

Whilst having a quick squint for a remembered clause contained in the Australian Uniting Church Act 1977 I instead found the followinng in the Victorian Act of the same year. Incidentally an Act more concerned with property and internal control rules than religion leaving me concluding that their god is indeed Mammon! - :

Now "am I wrongly reading this or is it discriminating against bankrupts & preventing them from being Trustees?"

Isn't Donald Trump a bankrupt?

@FrayedBear Yup several times over

Please read @Triphid 's response.

That is a very generous remark - you are conceding that it ever had a mind!

Yikes!

@FrayedBear "Yikes" doesn't quite cover it my friend, I think it's more " We are about to be f***ed over BIG time and we desperately need to get every Non-Christian, Atheist, Agnostic and Nonreligious person in Australia on side and start bombarding the Government with protest after protest BEFORE it becomes Law.
WE ARE being Discriminated against 110% with this proposed Bill, we WILL be silenced by it, have NO doubts about that.
I intend to lodge my comments and protest today via the following email address FoRConsultation@ag.au

@Triphid Isn't the xtian discrimination bill contrary to the Australian Constitution and requiring a referendum? I would have thought that any proposal to enforce 100% xtianity would be. Not even tbe communists in Russia or China could totally eradicate it.

See @Triphids response above. PM Scott Morrison is a rabid Pentecostal.

@FrayedBear Maybe I should add here that you meant to say that Morrison, aka Morriscum/ScumMO, etc, etc, IS the rabid Pentecostal and not me as reading your comment may imply to others.

@Triphid Thanks for pointing that out. I have corrected my sloppy wording.

@FrayedBear No worries my friend, I make typos regularly as anyone can tell you.

@Triphid Mine wasn't a typo it was sloppy wording and my bad.

I remeember being discriminated against 30+ years ago when a xtian school did not give me a job because I was divorced.

@FrayedBear Yeah, I know that similar feeling only too bloody well, back in the late 90's I was working in conjunction with the N.S.W. Department of Education in my capacity of a Child and Youth Crisis Counselor helping kids with their problems both in and out of schools.
No problems with the Publics Schools though, I was welcomed with open arms so to speak, BUT one morning I got a message from the local Department Head that my services were urgently required at the local Sacred Heart Primary School ( Catholic School of course).
I arrived at the school, ready and willing to do my best for the troubled child ONLY to find that a Priest and 2 Nuns were standing at the gate barring my entry purely on the grounds that I was a known Atheist and was " Not Welcome there no matter the problem a student had NOR what the Department said or decided."
Fortunately the child's parents saw reason and allowed me to help their child at their home, the outcome was successful and the child's problems were overcome, the parents also gained from my visits, etc, and subsequently moved their son from the Catholic School to a Public School where their son began to thrive and excel in his education.

@Triphid The disgusting Catholic indoctrination of nums and priests in deliberately misinterpreting words to maintain the dominance and control of the religion.

The joke is that it already exists. A statute passed for the Uniting Church includes a clause which says they are above the law and cannot be held to account. I can only surmise that whomever wrote this legislation believed that they are accountable to an omnipotent sky fairy.