As usual with things that are incorrect, the initial premise is wrong. You just decided to state that there are no morals. Then you proceeded later to say that you do the right thing which means that you have morals or what you have decided is right in the moral sense.

The Golden Rule is all anybody needs to know about morality.

Morals boil down to interections with those around you, IMO. Are you kind? Helpful?
Writing a letter to the editor is opinion & action, neither good nor bad. So is contributing to a cause.
I see moral actions all around me every day by people who never bother to ponder "morality", they just know what feels right.

Morals are internal. When the end of the day comes and you find yourself in that crude moment of truth when it is just you and your pillow: did I do right? did I do wrong? That is when your morals matter, and they matter just to you.
A moral code is external. Our right to satisfy our needs ends at the point where that same right starts for the next person. And the morality of every single decision stands on its own. 1000 moral acts do not wash away the scorn of an immoral one, just as 1000 immoral acts don’t take away the virtue of a moral one. And yet, a person’s social value, that is, how valuable a person is for his social group, is cumulative, and his or her stand before them will depend of whether that person is a 1000 to 1 or a 50 to 50.
Life is a balancing act.

I think your post is very confused. A moral code is nothing more than a set of rules or principles you choose to live by and there are many different moral codes from, do as you would be done by, to, do unto them before they do unto you, and another particularly useless set of 10 rules that a 6 yo could have crafted better. "Morals"as a separate noun seem to be something other people tend to define as a way to judge someone else. I think if you examined your behaviour carefully you'd see your moral code even if you weren't aware of it. Perhaps it's, I'm number one, or, be nice when it doesn't cost you anything, but I suspect it's not quite that dispassionate. It's not too difficult for example to see trump's moral code. "Only I matter" perhaps?

Just treat others as you wish to be treated. (Unless you like to be tied up and spanked!)

Wearing a mask around people is empathetic and a moral imperative.

As an atheist since 13, I don't need a Bible to be a kind, ethical person. Being a good person is a series of daily choices.

Moral

adjective

of, relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical. (dictionary.com)

You don't need morals if you have scruples.

It may well be that we all have to make up our own morals. But impulses in the direction of certain morals are certainly genetic, or they would not appear in many different animals, especially social species of mammals.

They are however then culturally modified, sometimes to an extreme degree. Where wrong comes into it, is where religions and other institutions especially make the false claims, such as : 1. That they are the origins of morals. 2. That they have higher morals, because theirs alone are divine, therefore belittling the morals of others. 3. They push the cultural modification of the moral impulses until they no longer have any relation to their real evolved purpose. ( For example taking the natural aggression needed in protecting self and family, and persuading people that it should be used to kill, rape, maim etc. people who could really never be any threat to us. )

Your questions are good, negating the statement about yourself

I do not know how you classify yourself and I do not wish to influence how you think of yourself but I guess if it happened in this group that classification would be philosopher.

I just want to say that as an ex -teacher wanting everyone to make themselves into scientists (and not succeeding very well) that this is how I would have started

First define a moral

without reference to waste material, because they do exist and have done so for a very long time.

Not easy

But not to worry I have become a philosopher too because people love words MORE than they do science.

I might continue this in two places on this site

1. In the above post in its group
2. My own science teachers group.

Depending on how other philosophers respond . Is this a challenge?

You haven't defined "right".

I am in general agreement with what you are saying. The right action is the one that leads to survival. Through instinct, instruction and trial and error we become adept at staying alive for awhile. The mistakes we make are not sins or moral wrongs. They are not even mistakes if those actions lead to learning.

Good and evil, moral vs. immoral—those dualities have no meaning from a cosmic perspective. Ultimate reality is good, period, and that’s all there is.

speak for yourself

Do or cause no harm.