I'm far more interested in becoming a better skeptic than I am in being involved in coversations that bash religion. Skepticism is central to my life, and my humanism & atheism come from that. My commitment is to skepticism as a method of inquiry.
Skepticism dictates that my non-religiousity must be contingent on the fact that I can't DISprove anything and that god-proving evidence may come to light. I think there's no god-like thing, I believe thetre's no god-like thing, and I live my life with the assumption that there's no god-like thing, but I can't know it. That's what skepticisn & science dictate.
I'm more likely to be open to talking about religion with believers that with non-beleivers, because I'd rather hear about the beuty one finds in their life than hear bashing.
I love the idea that you are concerned in becoming a better skeptic. it's important to have a well furnished mind and to that end I make it my business to temper my naturally challenging behaviour into being more structured in my discourse with people of faith.
Kind of a street pastor in reverse if you will. try to give people real food for thought as a response to their doctrine or dogma.
@DanDanDan Thanks Dan - to try an help myself I have joined a website called
[streetepistemology.com] not that my mission is to convert people to atheism but to help them to think clearly about how they make decisions and how they arrive at their beliefs. Any conversion being a by-product