Agnostic.com

8 14

Maher gets it right about segregation.

[rumble.com]

PBuck0145 7 Sep 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

@Scot321 The most vociferous objections emanate from those with the least confidence in their viewpoints.
If you can't make your point in two or three concise sentences, you do not have a point to make.

1

Sorry. Bill is right on this issue.

Nope. But instead of doing segregation as Bill insists, playing the song can be and is perceived as placating or empty pandering:
[nbcnews.com]

0

Maher aside, this is a critical view I take more seriously. I don’t see it as segregationist and on the surface it is inclusive instead, but perhaps cynical as a post Kaepernick gesture:

[deadspin.com]

Biting:
But, never fear, Jay-Z is here. According to the report, “Jay-Z’s Roc Nation is advising the league on the ‘Inspire Change’ initiative. Roc Nation is also working with the league to provide high-profile performers for events like the NFL Kickoff and the Super Bowl.” and “Roger Goodell, the league, and its teams are giving players the OK to take a knee to kneel in peaceful protest during the national anthem without repercussions. Imagine that, the NFL is allowing American citizens to do things that they already have the right to do while still blackballing Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid. The NFL is a place that has never been low on audacity.

Hmmm…

0

Nope. I stopped taking Maher seriously long ago. That he’s wearing his smarty glasses doesn’t make his points any more salient. That he and others are losing it over a…song at a sportsball event…where white elite sit in box seats while a good number of black players risk permanent damage to body and brain after surviving exploitation by the NCAA?

Maher’s comparisons to Maoist China and the breakdown of Yugoslavia are hyperbole. It’s just a song with inclusive placement alongside a song written by a long dead white guy.

[cnn.com]

For more than a century, “Lift Every Voice and Sing” has held a powerful place in American history. The hymn is known as the Black National Anthem, but it’s more than that. It’s a history lesson, a rallying cry, a pledge of unity, and as people gather to fight for equality and justice, it is an ever-present refrain.”

Wow that song reminds me of people getting carted off into forced reeducation camps AND Yugoslavia disintegrating into ethnic enclaves upon the collapse of Titoism all at the same time. Bill Maher is silly. Go back to stand-up routines Bill. Your snotty pseudo-intellectualism has worn itself out.

CNN’s analysis of a lyric from the scary song:

“True to our native land.”

Jacksonville school officials no doubt encouraged the inclusion of these patriotic sentiments, but this final phrase also reflects the Johnsons' and many other Blacks' faith in a better future in America. Before and after 1900, separatists perceived the US as a racist land that would never welcome Blacks, but integrationists such as the Johnson brothers argued that persuasion, protest, and organizing ultimately would create the coexistence of the races and equal opportunity for all. Such opposing views persist today.

"Smarty glasses" is a very childish statement. Try reading glasses, and at least sound intelligent.

@Alienbeing Do you find this factoid from CNN’s lyrical analysis [linked above] even the least bit ironic?:
“At the time [James Weldon Johnson] wrote this song in 1899, he was the principal of the segregated Stanton School in Jacksonville, Florida.” Now the song’s inclusion at pro football games is being spun as woke segregationism? Seriously?

And a lyric “Ring with the harmonies of Liberty” according to Shana L. Redmond [same link]: “The "Liberty" of which James Weldon Johnson wrote included the rights and protections that citizens of African descent in the United States were promised but had yet to receive. Although written more than a generation after the enslaved emancipated themselves during the US Civil War, the song spoke to a world rife with Jim Crow segregation and the threat of mob violence and lynching.”

I recall something of a 14th amendment cynically used for protection of corporations at roughly the same time blacks’ civil rights were being ignored or abolished.

[history.com]

@Scott321 Since you were unable to understand why I replied to you I'll spell it out. Your use of "cute" words or statements such as "smarty pants" and now "factoid" show a desire to obfuscate the issue, and I wonder what is the difference between a "fact" and a "factoid".

Next, who wrote a song is completly irrrelevent to the issue which is "separate but equal".

You don't make arguments, you prolong them.

2

Links aside, I daily prove that there is the purest of love that gets shown between people. All of our hearts are the same color. All of us have emotions. All of us are alive and bring something good to this world.

3

This shows that we in the U.S. still have a very very long way to go. There are still a LOT of racists and bigots in this country as well as people who may have good intentions but are actually causing harm in their efforts.

Though the U.S. doesn't hold a monopoly on racial discrimination.

We need more people like Obama to help bring people together and fewer people like Trump who work to tear us apart.

1

I totally agree with him.

2

I agree with him, wonder why so many Americans don't.

Because they are boneheads. rumble.com is a "conservative": outlet for Sean the Pawn Hannity. Always check the source.

@Mooolah
The knee-jerk dismissal of a post, based mainly or solely on the lack of a leftist imprimatur of the host site, flaunts inability or unwillingness to engage in independent rational thought.

Classical liberals are routinely censored by the MSM, and by the predominant social networks. These liberals therefore resort to using sites which eschew censorship. It is inevitable that such sites also attract posts by extremists. Consequently, one needs to judge each post on its merits, rather than by a partisan declaration of the plausibility of the post's host medium.

@PBuck0145 Not a knee jerk. Just am obsessed with sources. I read, I think, I evaluate, I regard sources. Conduits for misinfo as" rumble" is, might be dismissed upon view as an unreliable source. Wm F. Buckley, Geo. Will, Steve Schmitt & their publications attract my attention & respect. Sean Hannity not at all.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:624892
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.