"'It's over, people': WHO warns AGAINST vaccine mandates, repeated booster shots"
'The World Health Organization said in a statement that a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original COVID-19 vaccines is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.'
'Recognizing the inability of the shots to stop the spread, the U.N. health agency said future vaccines against COVID-19 must "be more effective in protection against infection thus lowering community transmission."'
...
'Separately, on Wednesday, the WHO said vaccination status should not be used to disqualify people from traveling internationally, advising governments to implement vaccine mandates only as a "last resort."'
'On Tuesday, the European Union's top health agency warned that getting boosted ever four months could harm the immune system's ability to fight off the disease. The European Medicines Agency advised countries instead to mirror the seasonal influenza vaccination strategy tied to the onset of the cold season.'
Of all the possible ways for the pandemic to end, the World Health Organization starting to tell us the truth was not the one I expected.
A vaccine to produce mucosal immunity and stop transmission of an upper respiratory infection would seem to have to be designed as a nasal spray, not a jab.
To be really useful, remove the "vaccine" status for these medicines and refer to them as pre-emptive medicines, which they are.
You see, emergency legislation around the world allows for the mandate of vaccines only in times of pandemic. Not any old medicines, vaccines. But the definition of vaccine is so vague now, needs to only "boost immunity", not provide it. On breakthrough transmissions alone, should not call them vaccines.