Agnostic.com

3 11

To a degree I do have some sympathy with the religious fundamentalist and literalist. ( Not much we are basically opposites. ) But when they look at moderate religion, especially cults, like the, so called, spiritual and metaphorical views of theism, Christian culture, and corporate religion for profit, then they see quite rightly, that it is, shallow, narcissistic, dishonestly cherry picking, manipulative, self serving, and corrupt, so that their moral instincts give them a visceral disgust at the very thought of it.

Their mistake is in thinking that more, and more extreme religion, not less or no religion, is a better answer.

Fernapple 9 July 14
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I don't agree that moderate religious sects are more "shallow, narcissistic, dishonestly cherry picking, manipulative, self serving, and corrupt" than fundamentalist ones. I think it's the other way around.

Could be, in fact almost certainly to some degree so, but if the fundamentalists see the moderates as all of those things, then they are not wrong either. Moderate religion helps the fundies in three ways, its failings make them more certain of their extreme views, it renders all religion respectable, and it creates the environment in which they can swim and look for support. Both negative and positive assistance.

@Fernapple I have maintained for a long time that moderate religionists are enablers of their more fanatical brethren.

Around the world, fundamentalist sects are the most dangerous, the most violent, the most determined to gain power, and the most willing to twist and cherry pick their own creed to suit that end. In the USA, we find nominal Catholics and Protestants among the ranks of the Christian nationalists, but the vast majority of them are Evangelical Christians. They are our own, home grown, American Taliban.

1

Spot on!

8

Yes, well in fact I think about this kind of thing as well, and perhaps there is some similarity in our thinking. You know how much I despise religion, so no doubts there. It occurs to me though that the general view is that somehow fundamentalist religions are perversions of these religions and moderate religion is the norm. I beg to differ. I actually think the fundamentalists are actually observing exactly the real core of their theologies: intolerance, rejection of all other faiths as heresies, rejection of anything that contradicts their teachings and their gods. In a way they are honest, crazy and anachronistic, but honest. It's modern versions of their religion which seek to pretend that their 'faiths' are tolerant and modern thinking. But it is pretense and hypocrisy. They put on shows of interfaithly tolerance, but the truth is their real teachings say exactly the opposite. Of course the fundamentalists hate so called modern versions of their religion, and they spiral down into greater and greater intolerance and anti modern thinking. The fundamentalists say what their religions really believe. So called progressive forms of their religion present a phoney false narrative. The bottom line is we need to be rid of the lot of them.

Exactly.

@Fernapple ... yes, exactly, 2 of my forarite dead horse abuser/ jockeys. blab on in mutual admiration. do you have a secret planet planet you going to retreat to together? what is all this studious ignoring getting you? is this some uccult form of altzheimers.?

Right on

@holdenc98 I guess your spell checker is on vacation at the moment. On 'studious' leave perhaps.

Amen 🙃

@David1955 .try to think beyond spelling

@holdenc98 you don't seem like a very thinking person to me, frankly.

@David1955 and you seem connvention bound and pretentious to me. i wouldnt bother, but rome is burning

@holdenc98 I don't even know what you're talking about, and worse nor do you. If you have an actual reasoned point about the relationship between moderate and extreme religions -- the point of the thread -- then do make it, with some grammatical and spelling accuracy, if that's not too much to ask. ( Enable spell check on your browser, and a grammar check, if you have one.) Elsewise, kindly go back to sleep.

@David1955 .im talking about thel likes of you two refusing to to come to grips with the uverwhelming two red herrings of contemporary left democratic electoral politics politics. feminism and black power. instead we get these endless new theoeetical abstruce insights into pointless augnostic minutia. is it your fondness for your assumed status here in this peanut gallary that produces this truthdenying cowardice?. meanwhile back home on earth reality the last hope of reversing biosphere degredation sinks . we will die with your iconic augnostiic sacred cow popularity here in place. it eappears to be at the heart of the likes of you. prove me wong.. fuck spelling accuracy......translate it.............. is you inner self really that small?..............

@holdenc98 still don't what what you're smoking, and anyway I'm an atheist, not an 'augnostiic'. As you were, my incoherent friend.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:676653
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.