Only in College and only if it is elective or in one's major (I.e., comparative religions).
I wouldn't say teach religion, but I would teach about religion. It's history, the multiple types and factions, how its affected art and music.. but not actual theology. And any teaching about it should be balanced by secular alternatives.
If that's not possible then I'd say no, don't do it at all. Here in my state one religion (oo guess which? ) is taught as a graded class. And its an easy A. So basically if you belong to the church you get a free A. I can't nope hard enough.
Yes, of course. Religion makes more sense than science, after all.
Of course there's an invisible man up in the sky. Great big dude. Older feller, big long beard, wears robes. Infinitely strong. He won't let us see him, but he's in charge of everything in the universe. Every photon. Every quark. Knows everything that ever was and ever will be, from the instant of the big bang down to the atomic weight of your yet unborn great granddaughter's armpit hair stubble at a particular nanosecond in the future.
He loves each and every one of us more than we can even imagine. And even though there's no evidence for any of this, and nobody has ever seen him, as he refuses to reveal himself, he demands that you faithfully believe all this, or he will cast you into hell to be tortured forever. Even a googolplex years of constant suffering of the worst pain possible has passed, you haven't even begun to serve your sentence for not believing in him.
What a comforting religion!
Yes. ALL religious should be taught so that students are aware of the various beliefs. Seeing these beliefs back to back with each other teaches students that there are some profound variations in the way people relate to their religion, the student learns to understand that religion isn't really science, but just ideologies that people adhere to.
Nothing wrong with exposing mythology to students as pure fiction. Myths reflect on the societies culture
Duh, no....
What about teaching about religions in a way that informs. A wise man once said, present just one faith, and I'll give you a believer, present all faiths, and I'll give you a skeptic. I don't know if this a perfect quote or even who said it. It's one of those vague memories, but if it's not an exact quote, I think you get the meaning behind it.
I can understand teaching historic events resulting from religion, (crusades, priest molestation, genital mutulation, Salem, etc...) but teaching the religion itself should not be included. @paul1967
Just like there is science class, a class on ALL the world religions maybe in with a Civics class or critical thinking class.
NO. Why would anyone here think that it should be taught in schools?
Only in an elective class on comparative religion or in one for which a study in comparative religion is a prerequisite.
As long as the teacher is not allowed to preach. We can all recognise preaching.
Absolutely not, how can you teach a subject that has no foundation in truth or facts?