Have never really been religious and don't see that religions actually follow moral codes all that much. I go by what I learned growing up and through personal observation and reflection.
I have always been non religious and I follow my own codes which change at my whim according to what is goign down - there was a book called the water babies (not a great read - religious connotations all teh way through ) There was a character called 'Mrs Do as you would be done by!' and I rather liked that .Basically I live and let live and if I am totally peed off by anybody I let them know ; and if they are insufferable I blank them - If I have friends they are people I can have a really good laugh with.
For me, the most significant moral code is the "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" dictum.
We aren stardust. We are golden. BehAve accordingly!
Leave other people the hell alone and hope they'll do the same
Odd question. I'd hate to be basing my moral values on the xtian book which is full of rape, murders, pedophilia, genocide, bigotry etc.
Basically I choose the option that will do the most good/least harm whenever I need to make a decision. Simplicity is a lovely thing.
I have been non-religious even as a child when forced to attend Catholic school. I am and honest, ethical, truthful person that respects others and tries to be kind always. It isn't easy.
My moral compass is instinct. Does it feel wrong? Don’t do it. Is it unkind? Don’t do it. Will it cause harm? Don’t do it. My moral compass as nothing to do with legal or religious codes. It’s built in. If I think a law is fucking stupid and my inner compass is not giving me a nudge, then I will do what I want - growing/smoking weed is a good example, or allowing a 17 year old to drink wine with dinner.
I have always had my own personal built in Jimminy Cricket to guide me.
I think the moral code must be written on our minds because there seems to be a number of people in agreement that we need to be kind and follow the notion of "do no harm". There are a number of people in history who followed their own moral code such as kill others, do harm to those in the way, starve people to death, use gas against those who are not like you... I am not sure if you think one of these moral codes is better than the other since both come from human minds. like to get your opinion on this.
I don't have a moral code. i have ethics. i always had them. i had them while i was being raised as a secular jew, i had them during my religious year, and i have had them since realizing, at the age of 15, that i was an atheist. what does disbelief in gods have to do with moral codes? are people only ethical if an invisible, omnipotent entity tells them (but not by tweet, for some reason) they should be? and which moral code would that be, anyway? there are lots of religions, lots of gods. should i follow zeus' moral code? he was a petulant rapist. how about loki, who wasn't so nice either? i don't need a code book to know right from wrong, and i don't need to be threatened with eternal damnation to care about right and wrong.
g
p.s. regarding "now that you are non-religious": lots of people have always been irreligious. not every atheist used to be religious, those who were may be more ethical now that they're not. i've seen some pretty unethical behavior from self-described christians, i must say!