Agnostic.com
1
1 Like Show
Maybe we ought to deport this new foul mouthed Muslim member of congress to Syria and give her to ...
DUCHESSA comments on Jan 5, 2019:
Please? Did I read correctly?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 5, 2019:
@IamNobody Neither do I!
Maybe we ought to deport this new foul mouthed Muslim member of congress to Syria and give her to ...
sfvpool comments on Jan 5, 2019:
Her ideas might be disgraceful and her words foulmouthed, but she represents how most Democrats feel about Trump. So, her religion is not what should be attacked, until she tries to inject her religion into law. Remember what John Adams wrote in 1797, in the "Treaty of Tripoli", “As the ...
Trajan61 replies on Jan 5, 2019:
I disagree that she represents the majority as Trump won the election and will likely win again in 2020.
Maybe we ought to deport this new foul mouthed Muslim member of congress to Syria and give her to ...
DUCHESSA comments on Jan 5, 2019:
Please? Did I read correctly?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 5, 2019:
@DUCHESSA Not sure
Maybe we ought to deport this new foul mouthed Muslim member of congress to Syria and give her to ...
DUCHESSA comments on Jan 5, 2019:
Please? Did I read correctly?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 5, 2019:
Yes you did
We have a new Muslim Member of Congress and she’s already calling for Trump’s impeachment! What ...
PinkyandtheBrain comments on Jan 5, 2019:
I know impeachment for what stupid dumb bitch.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 5, 2019:
Maybe we ought to give her to Isis.
Time - the most misunderstood concept in science.
Trajan61 comments on Jan 4, 2019:
The religous idiots don’t have a clue. They just can’t accept evolution or the Big Bang as it’s just to complicated.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@WilliamFleming Then I wonder why they still embrace religion.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
altschmerz comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Would you rather wreck the economy or make the world unlivable? Not that I believe sustainable energy is going to wreck anything.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@dahermit No I don’t believe him.
We have a new Muslim Member of Congress and she’s already calling for Trump’s impeachment! What ...
richiegtt comments on Jan 4, 2019:
Another example of how the liberal scum are turning this country to shit.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
Yes I agree.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Seriousreason comments on Jan 4, 2019:
For a socialist with absolutely no idea about economics, or any outcome from idiotic policy decisions having input into the lives of millions is a chilling thought... " Free stuff for everyone "..
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
Yes it is very chilling. And what’s even more chilling is that quite a few of the liberals like her!
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Cutiebeauty comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Opinion or fact?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@DarrelScott I totally agree.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
altschmerz comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Would you rather wreck the economy or make the world unlivable? Not that I believe sustainable energy is going to wreck anything.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@dahermit If green energy is economical that’s fine. But if it requires a heavy government subsidy just to compete we neeed to give it more time. It damn sure doesn’t deserve the same priority as fighting world war ll like Ocasio Cortez wants.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Moravian comments on Jan 4, 2019:
I don't think anyone believes the USA will be running totally on renewables by then but it will be part of the way there. In the UK electricity was 30% from renewables last year and several times throughout the year Scotland was using electricity that was 100% from renewables with a surplus to sell ...
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@Moravian If you don’t think the Latino imigrants aren’t increasing the carbon footprint here in the US significantly you are badly misinformed.
I'm vehemently opposed to smart gun technology... [bearingarms.com]
Trajan61 comments on Jan 4, 2019:
Biometric locks aren’t that reliable. If you have anything at all on your hands like dirt or water they don’t work properly.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@jondspen I’ve had trouble with mine working also.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
nvrnuff comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Must have been on Fox Noose, right?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@nvrnuff I’ve yet to see a single semi of farm tractor that runs on electricity so I think we have a ways to go yet.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
altschmerz comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Would you rather wreck the economy or make the world unlivable? Not that I believe sustainable energy is going to wreck anything.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@dahermit Solar and Wind still have to have government subsidies in order to compete with oil and gas. I’ve yet to see a single electric semi truck or farm tractor. Besides all green technology has to be back up with something like natural gas as the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine all the time. I like Solar best myself. I have 11 solar powered water pumps that I use to water cattle and they work great but I have to have quite a bit of reserve water as they don’t pump to much on cloudy days.
Nothing new there... [ammoland.com]
Trajan61 comments on Jan 4, 2019:
Chicago has always been a hotbed of corrupt politicians intent on stripping private citizens of their right to bear arms. And that’s where Obama spent a lot of his time. I guess that’s the reason he was just another corrupt politician.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@Pbpierson2 unfortunately most of the main stream media is very liberal.
Nothing new there... [ammoland.com]
Trajan61 comments on Jan 4, 2019:
Chicago has always been a hotbed of corrupt politicians intent on stripping private citizens of their right to bear arms. And that’s where Obama spent a lot of his time. I guess that’s the reason he was just another corrupt politician.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
@Pbpierson2 Well said. ?
At one point the Democrats were all for a border fence... [thefederalist.com]
Leutrelle comments on Jan 4, 2019:
This is a very typical tactic and increasingly more so as the Democrats continue to be increasingly more fascist. I would like to know if we even have thought of what the maximum population we want in the USA? 500 million, 1 billion, or what ever? Right now and for the next few decades into the ...
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
Less population would be good.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Moravian comments on Jan 4, 2019:
I don't think anyone believes the USA will be running totally on renewables by then but it will be part of the way there. In the UK electricity was 30% from renewables last year and several times throughout the year Scotland was using electricity that was 100% from renewables with a surplus to sell ...
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
What’s bothered me more than anything is that the same people namely the democrats who want to convert to expensive green technology and mandate expensive emission control equipment also want open borders which has resulted in us having a much higher population and depletion of the countries resources. Hell the Catholic Latino’s encouraged by the church continue to have large families and pour over the US border and that contributes to a damn good portion of our excessive pollution and carbon emissions.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
Leutrelle comments on Jan 4, 2019:
Trajan61 trust me that I am not taking sides on this issue. I liked cutiebeauty's 1 day ban concept. It is way less destructive than a permanent ban. Perhaps a one day ban on her may bring better results.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 4, 2019:
What bothered more than anything was her obvious biased against us conservatives as she has banned at least 2 of us while tolerating far more from the liberals. I’ve decided that rather than banning her I will just leave her political debate group.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
Just a notch or 2 above Ocasio Cortez and Bernie but still to left wing. I could never support any of the democrats as they are just to crazy. The democrats don’t have anyone who can beat Trump anyway.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@Moravian You means it alway takes a Republican president to straighten things out after having a racist idiot like Obama for 8 years.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Wangobango3 comments on Jan 3, 2019:
The Green Economy is where the new, well paying jobs will come from. It would happen a lot faster if corporate taxation encouraged real R&D instead of rewarding quick buck artists.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@Wangobango3 And yes I do have Medicare.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Wangobango3 comments on Jan 3, 2019:
The Green Economy is where the new, well paying jobs will come from. It would happen a lot faster if corporate taxation encouraged real R&D instead of rewarding quick buck artists.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@Wangobango3 It’s going to take some time to get it done and it’s definitely not going to happen by 2030. Maybe 2130?
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
DarrelScott comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Scary thing is there are actually so called adults who voted for her.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
That is very scary.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Paige56 comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Does she even know what it means?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
I doubt it.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
nvrnuff comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Must have been on Fox Noose, right?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
If you really believe the US economy could go 100% green by 2030 you are truly delusional.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
altschmerz comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Would you rather wreck the economy or make the world unlivable? Not that I believe sustainable energy is going to wreck anything.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@dahermit Denmark isn’t even scheduled to be 100% green till 2050 and that doesn’t mean they will be able to accomplish that feat. Denmark’s high tax rate is the highest in the world at 60%.
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Wangobango3 comments on Jan 3, 2019:
The Green Economy is where the new, well paying jobs will come from. It would happen a lot faster if corporate taxation encouraged real R&D instead of rewarding quick buck artists.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
I’ve yet to see a single electric Semi or farm tractor. Do you seriously think we could go 100% green by 2030 without doing major damage to the US economy?
If Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has her way on going 100% green by 2030 it will wreck the US economy so ...
Cutiebeauty comments on Jan 3, 2019:
Opinion or fact?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
Fact
Donald Trump's business links to the mob - BBC Newsnight - YouTube
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
The BBC is a liberal piece of crap and therefore very unreliable.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@snytiger6 If you really believe that you are quite delusional.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
Just a notch or 2 above Ocasio Cortez and Bernie but still to left wing. I could never support any of the democrats as they are just to crazy. The democrats don’t have anyone who can beat Trump anyway.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@Marine You are quite delusional.
Now, that's an interesting thought:
IamNobody comments on Jan 3, 2019:
They want a mass of brainless brutes for votes. It's a disturbing loop hole in our system.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
I think you got it exactly right.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
Just a notch or 2 above Ocasio Cortez and Bernie but still to left wing. I could never support any of the democrats as they are just to crazy. The democrats don’t have anyone who can beat Trump anyway.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@Moravian If your politicians are as radical as she is Britian will never survive.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
Just a notch or 2 above Ocasio Cortez and Bernie but still to left wing. I could never support any of the democrats as they are just to crazy. The democrats don’t have anyone who can beat Trump anyway.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 3, 2019:
@Moravian I’ve noticed your still using oil and gas in Britain. Ocasio Cortez wants to discontinue all oil and gas use by 2035. She also wants open borders with unrestricted immigration. If that’s not extremely radical I’d don’t know what is!
This evening at dusk and in heavy rain a person was driving a black car without their headlights on...
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
Requiring a total inspection is over kill and to much government regulation. I do think you should be required to have insurance before you can get your tag but requiring an inspection is to much. Hell some states require an emissions check before you can get a tag. That is major overkill as a lot ...
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@Varn Here in Oklahoma no emission test is required and I’m damn thankful for that.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
jerry99 comments on Jan 1, 2019:
She's not my first choice but she's far better than anyone on the other side.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@jerry99 You are delusional.
This evening at dusk and in heavy rain a person was driving a black car without their headlights on...
Trajan61 comments on Jan 2, 2019:
Requiring a total inspection is over kill and to much government regulation. I do think you should be required to have insurance before you can get your tag but requiring an inspection is to much. Hell some states require an emissions check before you can get a tag. That is major overkill as a lot ...
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@Amisja You can keep your UK inspection laws. I like the lack of them here in Oklahoma just fine.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
jerry99 comments on Jan 1, 2019:
She's not my first choice but she's far better than anyone on the other side.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@jerry99 None of them have a chance against Trump.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she will seek the presidency in 2020 - The Washington Post
AtheistReader comments on Jan 1, 2019:
I like her. Why are people so reluctant about this?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@HippieChick58 I feel the same way about that idiot Obama as you do about Trump.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
inthecloset comments on Jan 1, 2019:
She seems very sweet as far as I'm concerned. Good for her for banning people using that tone and language.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@DarrelScott Thanks. It’s alway good to have support from my fellow conservatives.
Democrats seem to believe that foreigners are more important than our oil wn people
Trajan61 comments on Jan 1, 2019:
All those idiots are interested in are more Hispanic voters. They could care less about us American citizens!
Trajan61 replies on Jan 2, 2019:
@Robecology If that’s the case how come California is overrun with Latino’s and is a very liberal state. People who don’t believe imigration doesn’t contribute to overpopulation and depletion of our countries resources are truly delusional.
Happy New Year! I really like this site.
Trajan61 comments on Jan 1, 2019:
So what do you purpose to just let everybody who wants to to just come on up? After 8 years of that idiot Obama Trump is like a breath of fresh air. And your man Sanders is the biggest idiot of them all, except for Ocasio Cortez.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@Closeted ??
And....... SOME folks want Mrs. Obama as POTUS???? I don't think so:
Captain_Feelgood comments on Jan 1, 2019:
IF SHE WINS I WILL MOVE TO CANADA... I'M NOT FUCKING JOKING, MAN,, I'LL DO IT... oh wait.. that threat doesn't work l hear... never mind..
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
Don’t worry she couldn’t win even if she ran. Oh wait her husband the ex-president that the liberals love so much! ???
Interesting read: [foxnews.com]
DUCHESSA comments on Dec 31, 2018:
Do you think they will deal with R v W?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@DUCHESSA Yes it is and I worry about some of the religous zealots who want to ban all abortions because I have a bussiness associate who is that way. He even wants to force a raped woman who becomes pregnant to be forced to have that kid. When I ask him what his rationale was for that he replied “how can 2 wrongs make a right”. He is very extreme.
Interesting read: [foxnews.com]
DUCHESSA comments on Dec 31, 2018:
Do you think they will deal with R v W?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@DUCHESSA I understand.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
SpikeTalon comments on Jan 1, 2019:
A little busy over the New Year's holiday, will look into that more when I get a chance.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
? No hurry
Interesting read: [foxnews.com]
DUCHESSA comments on Dec 31, 2018:
Do you think they will deal with R v W?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@DUCHESSA I totally agree with the Roe V Wade decision but I’ve always thought that issue’s like that should be decided by a vote of the people rather than judges on a court.
Have a Happy New Year fellow conservatives, cheers.
DUCHESSA comments on Jan 1, 2019:
Thank you guys. The same to all of you...I went to sleep by 10 PM...I missed the ball...as usual. :)
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
Happy New Year to you as well!
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
inthecloset comments on Jan 1, 2019:
She seems very sweet as far as I'm concerned. Good for her for banning people using that tone and language.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@inthecloset I can assure you KKGator was not being sarcastic. And evidently neither was cutiebeauty because she banned me.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
MissKathleen comments on Jan 1, 2019:
I’ve joined your group just to comment and then will go away. What it is time for, is tolerance and acceptance. We could stop being vindictive and vitriolic and learn to respect each other’s perspective and try to spend more time working together to cure the bigger problems of the world.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
So why did she ban me. KKGator was the the one who started it.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
inthecloset comments on Jan 1, 2019:
She seems very sweet as far as I'm concerned. Good for her for banning people using that tone and language.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
If she’s going to ban people for using bad language why didn’t she ban KKGator? Instead she banned me.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
Cutiebeauty comments on Jan 1, 2019:
My bans aren't permanent.... As you should know... Grow up and put on your big boy pants
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@Cutiebeauty You seem a lot more inclined to ban conservatives than you do liberals. I don’t care whether you lift the ban or not as I’m not going to participate in your political debate group anyway as you are to biased and I don’t particularly care for your mod KKGator who claims to be independent but seems to be very biased against us conservatives.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
azzow2 comments on Jan 1, 2019:
I had heard her claim to be liberal she was striving to see the different political philosophies, this could be why she joined our group. Which I am all for betterment. However, if she is no longer observing and has made a stern decision to actively band the normal crowd then give her the heave-ho.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@Cutiebeauty You defend him while at the same time trashing Trump so that would seem to be an obvious conclusion.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
Cutiebeauty comments on Jan 1, 2019:
My bans aren't permanent.... As you should know... Grow up and put on your big boy pants
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
It’s disturbing to me that you tolerate all kinds of ranting and raving from the liberal side but ban us conservatives for much less.
I think it’s time to ban Cutiebeauty from the conservative atheist group as she is definitely no ...
azzow2 comments on Jan 1, 2019:
I had heard her claim to be liberal she was striving to see the different political philosophies, this could be why she joined our group. Which I am all for betterment. However, if she is no longer observing and has made a stern decision to actively band the normal crowd then give her the heave-ho.
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@Cutiebeauty Kind of hard to be a centerist when you obviously liked Obama who was I left wing gun control nut!
Interesting read: [foxnews.com]
DUCHESSA comments on Dec 31, 2018:
Do you think they will deal with R v W?
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
@DUCHESSA I misunderstood you. No I don’t think they will overturn Roe v Wade. Even if they did the states would quickly reinstate it. But I don’t think it will be overturned.
Have a Happy New Year fellow conservatives, cheers.
richiegtt comments on Dec 31, 2018:
You also Spike .
Trajan61 replies on Jan 1, 2019:
Happy New Year to you as well! ?????
I think Michelle Obama should run in 2020.
Trajan61 comments on Dec 31, 2018:
She is a idiot or she wouldn’t have married that arrogant, racist dipshit Barack Obama!!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@KKGator You are the scumbag!!
Interesting read: [foxnews.com]
DUCHESSA comments on Dec 31, 2018:
Do you think they will deal with R v W?
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
Yes I do
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
JackPedigo comments on Dec 29, 2018:
I agree on the shielding of illegal immigrants can cause problems but this one case absolutely does not justify a multi-billion wall that will have such a devastating effect on the environment and some people's property. This is an example of over excessiveness!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
So according to you the Maginot line worked so why not the wall on the southern border?
Well, he DID!
Captain_Feelgood comments on Dec 31, 2018:
You know a woman that looks like that wouldn't marry a man that looks like him if he wasn't VERY successful. ... just saying .. ?
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@Captain_Feelgood They’ll do that as well. ????
This woman is downright scary: [foxnews.com]
Captain_Feelgood comments on Dec 31, 2018:
Not sure which one is worse though....
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
I can’t believe voters elected that idiot!
Well, he DID!
Captain_Feelgood comments on Dec 31, 2018:
You know a woman that looks like that wouldn't marry a man that looks like him if he wasn't VERY successful. ... just saying .. ?
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
If you have plenty of money you will always have plenty of beautiful younger women if you want them!
Pelosi is taking the government shutdown awfully hard.
nicknotes comments on Dec 30, 2018:
It's Trump's shutdown...he can end it. Pelosi can not.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@nicknotes Even though Trump uses the term The Wall a lot the money is for border security, most of it likely electronic or a fence and increased border patrol presence.
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
JackPedigo comments on Dec 29, 2018:
I agree on the shielding of illegal immigrants can cause problems but this one case absolutely does not justify a multi-billion wall that will have such a devastating effect on the environment and some people's property. This is an example of over excessiveness!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@JackPedigo The Maginot like didn’t work because If was outdated at the time it was built by advances in moble warfare and there was no way a fixed fortification could withstand an assault from the powerful German Wehrmacht with its Blitzkreig tastics. The Iron Curtain worked quite well at curtailing the movement of people from the communist east to the capitalist west. There’s never been any intention of building a wall all along the border, just in heavily populated areas. Even though Trump likes to use the term “build the wall” the 5 billion is for border security. Since you oppose border security what do you purpose, just let all the people that want to come just come on up?
I think Americans are far more likely to die from lack of adequate Healthcare than from a terrorist ...
Trajan61 comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Yes I agree and they’re more likely to be struck by lightning than shot by a mass shooter but try telling that to the gun control nuts.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@Lorajay The only way children are going to be safe in schools are for there to be someone who is trained to shoot back like a qualified teacher or if you can afford it a security guard. Unsecured gun free zones are dangerous as they are soft targets.
This woman is downright scary: [foxnews.com]
Cutiebeauty comments on Dec 31, 2018:
You guys are the reason she's here... lol don't be scared though.... It's just Little woman....
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
Yes but she dangerous because she’s a woman with power.
Trump? For or against ? Consider current events in your responses please ...
Trajan61 comments on Dec 27, 2018:
Cutiebeauty have you banned Vetern229:? If you have you have committed an injustice and I’m not even sure I want to participate in this group especially considering the ranting and raving of the liberals you tolerate.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@Cutiebeauty You did ban a conservative , Vetern229: from the group didn’t you?
Trump? For or against ? Consider current events in your responses please ...
Trajan61 comments on Dec 27, 2018:
Cutiebeauty have you banned Vetern229:? If you have you have committed an injustice and I’m not even sure I want to participate in this group especially considering the ranting and raving of the liberals you tolerate.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 31, 2018:
@Bobby9 Yes I agree with you about cutiebeauty. I’d just as soon comment or post in the politics section on the main forum as this one as she is biased toward the liberals and not really fair on allowing debate from both liberals and conservative on equeal terms as she tolerates a lot of ranting and raving from people like KKGator but bans people like Vetern229 for less.
Declining birth rates. Is this not something we should be aiming for?
memorylikeasieve comments on Dec 30, 2018:
I don't think we're going to go extinct because of it.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
I’d say it was the number one threat to human civilization.
Pelosi is taking the government shutdown awfully hard.
nicknotes comments on Dec 30, 2018:
It's Trump's shutdown...he can end it. Pelosi can not.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@nicknotes So what do you suggest, just let everyone who wants to to just come on up?
Pelosi is taking the government shutdown awfully hard.
nicknotes comments on Dec 30, 2018:
It's Trump's shutdown...he can end it. Pelosi can not.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@nicknotes The Democrats created the problem by not approving 5 billion for border security. Hell thats just a small portion of the overall budget.
What is your "get-rich-quick" tip that isnt a scam?
Trajan61 comments on Dec 30, 2018:
You can marry more money in 5 minutes than you can make in a lifetime!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Rustee Yes you can do that as well.
Here’s something put up by Bigpawbullets that makes a lot of sense.
snytiger6 comments on Dec 29, 2018:
Your premise is faulty. We have troops stationed around the world to protect American business interests,not foreign borders. Virtually all military actions over seas are to protect American interests and the foreign resources American businesses are exploiting around the world,.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Lorajay We helped the mujahideen to throw the Russians out of Afghanistan. And it was some of the same people who blew up the twin towers. Kind of wished we’d just let the Russians have it.
I am very interested in seeing the "On the Basis of Sex' the Ruth Bader Ginsberg movie.
gearl comments on Dec 30, 2018:
I agree with you on wanting to see it and waiting for streaming. I sure hopes she hangs in there until 2020.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@BufftonBeotch And you need to quit watching CNN and MSNBC.
Here’s something put up by Bigpawbullets that makes a lot of sense.
snytiger6 comments on Dec 29, 2018:
Your premise is faulty. We have troops stationed around the world to protect American business interests,not foreign borders. Virtually all military actions over seas are to protect American interests and the foreign resources American businesses are exploiting around the world,.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Lorajay Better to fight them over there than here.
Here’s something put up by Bigpawbullets that makes a lot of sense.
Lorajay comments on Dec 29, 2018:
That population explosion would secure social security for generations to come. If anyone really wants to make sure the brown people stop coming all they have to do is make sure anyone that hires an illegal is punished both financially and criminally. They come for the jobs, if the jobs are not ...
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
The population explosion would do a hell of a lot more harm than good but I guess if your already pretty old like yourself you would probably not see the bad results.
I am very interested in seeing the "On the Basis of Sex' the Ruth Bader Ginsberg movie.
gearl comments on Dec 30, 2018:
I agree with you on wanting to see it and waiting for streaming. I sure hopes she hangs in there until 2020.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@BufftonBeotch I’d say no chance.
Here’s something put up by Bigpawbullets that makes a lot of sense.
Green_eyes comments on Dec 29, 2018:
America is an ideal position. It has an ally(at least for now) to the north and another major trading partner to the south. It is protected on both sides by oceans. These are the same reasons that protected America in WWII, So which borders are you referring to?
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Lorajay Sanctuary cities are illegal so I don’t understand why the people who are defying the federal government by implemented them aren’t arrested as federal law trumps state and local law.
Pelosi is taking the government shutdown awfully hard.
nicknotes comments on Dec 30, 2018:
It's Trump's shutdown...he can end it. Pelosi can not.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
Trumps willing to deal, the democrats apparently not.
I am very interested in seeing the "On the Basis of Sex' the Ruth Bader Ginsberg movie.
gearl comments on Dec 30, 2018:
I agree with you on wanting to see it and waiting for streaming. I sure hopes she hangs in there until 2020.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@BufftonBeotch The polls showed that Hillary was going to win by a landslide. Las Vegas oddsmakers are more reliable and they are giving 7-5 odds that Trump will be re-elected in 2020.
Here’s something put up by Bigpawbullets that makes a lot of sense.
snytiger6 comments on Dec 29, 2018:
Your premise is faulty. We have troops stationed around the world to protect American business interests,not foreign borders. Virtually all military actions over seas are to protect American interests and the foreign resources American businesses are exploiting around the world,.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@snytiger6 It would have cost a huge fortune to do what you just suggested and I doubt those numbers add up at all. I have no problem withdrawing out military from Syria and Afghanistan. We do need to maintain some presence in Iraq to prevent Iran from taking over in the vacuum we created when we took out Sadam and also to prevent Isis from making a come back. It’s makes a hell of a lot more sense to invest in railroad transit and mass transit in big cities than to try to make everything run on electricity.
How do most Native Americans and tribes feel about the state of Israel?
Trajan61 comments on Dec 29, 2018:
I fully support Israel because of the grave injustice done to them in World War ll and also because they are the only viable democracy in the Mideast. Also the have stood their ground against radical Islamic states like Iran and groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and others.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Jolanta They wouldn’t have to worry about being invaded if they’d quit firing rockets at Israel so what are you talking about?
Here’s something put up by Bigpawbullets that makes a lot of sense.
snytiger6 comments on Dec 29, 2018:
Your premise is faulty. We have troops stationed around the world to protect American business interests,not foreign borders. Virtually all military actions over seas are to protect American interests and the foreign resources American businesses are exploiting around the world,.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@snytiger6 What’s wrong with protecting the worlds resources?
Wow, Trump scores 5 out of 5!
Trajan61 comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Sounds just like Obama and crooked Hillary!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@t1nick You are validating mine as well. ???
I am very interested in seeing the "On the Basis of Sex' the Ruth Bader Ginsberg movie.
gearl comments on Dec 30, 2018:
I agree with you on wanting to see it and waiting for streaming. I sure hopes she hangs in there until 2020.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
What are you talking about? She’ll have to last till 2025! And I don’t see that happening.
Wow, Trump scores 5 out of 5!
Trajan61 comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Sounds just like Obama and crooked Hillary!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@jerry99 Seems I’m trying just as hard as you are.???
Wow, Trump scores 5 out of 5!
Trajan61 comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Sounds just like Obama and crooked Hillary!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@jerry99 You mean just like most of the liberals on this website? ????
All the more reason to secure the border!
bigpawbullets comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Concrete vs Technology. I have to vote for technology, and here's why: First, I've a bit of experience from the mid 70s "down Mexico way". My last duty station was Libby AAF (Ft. Huachuca, AZ). At that time, the ASA (Army Security Agency) was directly supporting U.S. Customs & The Border Patrol....
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@bigpawbullets Yes and I love him for it. ??
All the more reason to secure the border!
bigpawbullets comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Concrete vs Technology. I have to vote for technology, and here's why: First, I've a bit of experience from the mid 70s "down Mexico way". My last duty station was Libby AAF (Ft. Huachuca, AZ). At that time, the ASA (Army Security Agency) was directly supporting U.S. Customs & The Border Patrol....
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
Yes I agree and I’m sure that Trump’s goal. He’s just using the term “build the wall to torment the democrats”. ???
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
TheAstroChuck comments on Dec 29, 2018:
Everyone wants secure borders, but there are far better ways of accomplishing security than a brick wall. Moreover, a wall will have virtually no impact on drugs, criminals, or terrorists entering the US since most come via air and sea.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Dave75 I think he really means border security.
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
blumandolin comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Consider that police in a year kill far more unarmed citizens than illegal aliens do.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@blumandolin Sounds reasonable but what about the sanctuary states and cities.
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
Lucy_Fehr comments on Dec 30, 2018:
The wall is a waste of money. If humans can scale mountains and get across oceans, a damn wall will not stop them. It is not just the cost of building it, it is the astronomical sum of money needed to maintain it that many detractors have with it
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Varn Sounds very reasonable. We need to work together to solve the illegal imigration problem.
I've noticed on this website that it doesn't take much heat get a snowflake meltdown.
SpikeTalon comments on Dec 29, 2018:
A good portion of those on this site have abandoned religion and gods in favor of worshipping bigger government, and yeah it doesn't take much to set those folks off.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
Yes I agree most of those on this website have abandoned god but the overwhelming majority of them have replaced that with a desire for big government or socialism.
How do most Native Americans and tribes feel about the state of Israel?
Trajan61 comments on Dec 29, 2018:
I fully support Israel because of the grave injustice done to them in World War ll and also because they are the only viable democracy in the Mideast. Also the have stood their ground against radical Islamic states like Iran and groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and others.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Jolanta Well you are supporting people who don’t even recognize Isreal’s right to exist and are calling for its destruction so that’s what it sounds like.
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
JackPedigo comments on Dec 29, 2018:
I agree on the shielding of illegal immigrants can cause problems but this one case absolutely does not justify a multi-billion wall that will have such a devastating effect on the environment and some people's property. This is an example of over excessiveness!
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
So let’s just do away with border security? Is that your suggestion?
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
TheAstroChuck comments on Dec 29, 2018:
Everyone wants secure borders, but there are far better ways of accomplishing security than a brick wall. Moreover, a wall will have virtually no impact on drugs, criminals, or terrorists entering the US since most come via air and sea.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
So what are you suggesting? Do away with border security? And you don’t think doing that wiould bring about a population explosion?
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
blumandolin comments on Dec 30, 2018:
Consider that police in a year kill far more unarmed citizens than illegal aliens do.
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
So are you suggesting we just open our borders and let everyone who wants come on up? And when we catch them just turn them loose?
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
Lucy_Fehr comments on Dec 30, 2018:
The wall is a waste of money. If humans can scale mountains and get across oceans, a damn wall will not stop them. It is not just the cost of building it, it is the astronomical sum of money needed to maintain it that many detractors have with it
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
Are you saying we don’t need border security? That’s what this is about. There will only be walls in cities.
All the more reason to secure the southern border.
Varn comments on Dec 30, 2018:
‘Sanctuary Cities’ are a haven. It’s a fuckin mess.. It’s a different culture arriving; I recently spent 6 years employed between 3 west coast school districts, and the training we were given regarding gang violence alone was chilling. Additionally, the cost (often hidden by leftist ...
Trajan61 replies on Dec 30, 2018:
@Varn Not sure what the answer is but I’m sure there should be some way to compromise. I’d do think we need to get a handle on illegal imigration one somehow.

Photos

0 Like Show
5
5 Like Show
1
1 Like Show
1
1 Like Show
0 Like Show
1
1 Like Show
1
1 Like Show
Atheist
Here for community
  • Level8 (189,893pts)
  • Posts700
  • Comments
      Replies
    5,393
    5,565
  • Followers 28
  • Fans 0
  • Following 14
  • Fav. Posts 1
  • Joined Jan 4th, 2018
  • Last Visit Very recently
Trajan61's Groups