Whoopee is a hoot!

I need to read the article,but as i recall the first owners at least if that's what happened? Were very liberal i think cause they banned me for speech that could be considered on the right ..

Seems no one is being banned now.thats why I'll vye surprised if the so called right whatever is the original owners

Do you care to explain how Richard Dawkins Joe Rogan and many others mentioned are far right? I'd also like to know why self proclaimed religious people such as Jordan Peterson Steven Crowder and Ben Shapiro would put money into an atheist dating site? Your idw link just takes me to the main page showing me nothing, and your last link is some of the biggest bullshit I've ever read. Don't come here claiming these links are evidence, they are not. They are the ramblings of someone with too much time on there hands.

These Obstructionist regressive republican christofascist’s maga death cult member all feel they are intellectually superior to anyone else, yet always decry themselves as victims of any bogie man that they feel is against them right or left!!!

It is all about victimization and victimhood which drives their continual sense of being abused!!!

They all like to eat each alive like the intellectual cannibalist they have wrought upon one another!!!

So 'Reckon is my time to leave this Shit!!!

Painfully waded through this Salon opinion piece: poorly written and sloppily “researched.”

So....you think they're tracking us or something? lmao

Most of those people are prolly agnostic, if not downright atheists anyway. Gotta look past their public personas. If they are "religious" might be in the political nutso sense, not any true belief....so they're really more like us anyway

Well at least this isn't another meme ............

People are people and we all have flaws. To pick and choose specifics with an attitude of offense is easy to do with just about anyone. No one is perfect and if it were possible then we would strive to be so.
To believe or not to believe in a deity is a choice. I have made mine.

Honestly, I did not think it was run by anyone any more.

Is Classical Liberalism "right wing " ??
I always thought that American left-wingers call themselves "liberals".

I honestly do not care.
So far, there is no reason to jettison a site I enjoy merely based on the political leanings of those allegedly responsible for it's creation, or continued existence.

It's not like they're pushing their agendas on me or anyone else.
If that should begin to occur, I'll raise 10 kinds of hell, on my way out the door.

I don't appreciate purity testing, guilt by association or contrived innuendo, as presented in the Salon article. As soon as anyone sees propaganda like that, alarms should go off. The right wing will do anything no matter how depraved or evil if they think it will help their cause. Recognizing disinformation is the whole point of thinking critically.

Idw has taken over New atheism

As the owner/s of this site seem/s neither to interfere with our posts nor to inject any doctrinal slant by posting anything political or otherwise himself/themselves - I think it matters not a jot what their political views are. Remembering that we pay no fees and are not subjected to any advertising, my view is just enjoy the site while it lasts, and if knowing the political slant of the owners proves too much for us to stomach, then of course there is no compunction to stay, as at any time we’re completely at liberty to leave.

The ideology of the owner of this site has been an open secret for years..

Am failing to see the mission. Other than trying to convience agnostics that they would be leaning to the right.......don't see that happening.

Of course we all know that a right-wing propaganda network would run an atheist site