The question is completely misleading. Tarot cards exist. Numerology, horoscopes, and palm readers exist. The practitioners of said disciplines exist and seem to make some form of living. The real question is the efficacy. Are the claims supported by real, reputable and repeatable evidence.

I'm assuming that the multiverse option refers to M Theory? I'm not sure the likelihood exceeds 10%, but the science people say it's possible, so I'll give it a go.

There's a more comprehensive list in "Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia" by Brian Regal

I was a werewolf, but I am alright Nnnnoooooooooooooowwwwwww!

At present these work for/are real to me.
I think taking any kind of positive action or embracing an inspiring idea or being open to possibility is important in learning and growing.

My views may change lol.

I think that our brains are capable of doing way more than we currently utilize them for. And I think it is totally possible that there are other cognizant beings that exist who knows where but not here. And I don't understand why chiropractic is on here. It's your bones, you put them in the right place and you feel better…

In re tarot cards: In no way d ok I think that they are able to divine the future; however, I have been using them for meditative practice following a Jungian approach in interpreting them.

10% is probably still to high for most of these.

So how is 'Multiverse' here different from 'Alternate Realities'?