Agnostic.com
3 1

Am I the only one who thinks that Bill Buckner should not be the scapegoat for the Red Sox losing in '86? How in the hell is Bob Stanley still walking this earth?

Darthpug 7 June 5
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Being a Sox fan since i was kid in the late 60s, it was gut wrenching to say the least. However, and long time Sox fans would understand, it wasn't totally unexpected.

0

I've always had a "What If" question about 1986. What if the Red Sox hadn't traded Dennis Eckersley to the Cubs in 1984 for Buckner.? Would the Red Sox have noticed (like Tony LaRussa did) that the washed up starter was usually unhittable for his first 2 innings and would have a career rebirth that ended up in Cooperstown? Too bad about Buckner, instead of being remembered for over 2,700 hits and batting over 300 in six seasons, it takes one bad play to obscure an entire career. And yes, Bob Stanley was just as guilty, maybe more so, than Buckner.

BobbyJaan Level 7 July 22, 2018
0

As Red Sox fan, I still get steamed (pun intended) about '86. IMO, however, the real culprit was the manager. McNamara should never have taken Clemens out of Game 6. Also, where was Dave Stapleton as a defensive replacement for Buckner ? Still hurts all these years later !

Cosmos57 Level 4 June 23, 2018

This is taken off Wikipedia.....

The move to leave Schiraldi in the game, however, was not as widely criticized as the one to leave Buckner in. Buckner had been suffering from ankle problems since requiring two surgeries (one for each ankle) to fix injuries over a decade earlier. The Red Sox acquired Buckner during the 1984 season and used Dave Stapleton, who had been the team's first baseman prior to the acquisition, as a late inning replacement for Buckner. When initially asked why Stapleton stayed on the bench, McNamara said that he felt that Buckner deserved to be on the field if the Red Sox were to hold on and win the game.[20] Stapleton was not happy about remaining on the bench and in 1995, he blasted McNamara in a book written about the '86 Red Sox. McNamara responded in the same 2011 interview with Costas that the real reason why he did not put Stapleton in the game was because Stapleton was known by his teammates as "Shaky", in reference to his lack of stout defensive play.

Recent Visitors 6

Photos

Posted by GreatNaniWatching the World Series with my Dad. This is stressing me out! The Nats are not playing well at home!

Posted by Nichole765Sorry Boss!

Posted by Nichole765Hi... Cubs fan here.

Posted by JimGIf you were behind the plate, how would you call this. [youtu.be] The rule is pretty clear, right?

  • Top tags#baseball #video #world #religion #Omg #reason #children #Texas #hope #hell #humor #musicians #dying #cats #GeorgeCarlin #money #Christian #NRA #church #saved #newspaper #Australia #politicians #sleep #divorce #kids #genetic #Diet #death #scientific #physics #laws #spirit #reincarnation #spirits #liberty #culture #languages #Theater #fanatics #plays #faith #conservatives #DonaldTrump #beliefs #racist #Awe #parents #Generations #fox ...

    Members 26Top

    Moderator