Is this the real beginning of the destruction of the Wall of Separation? SCOTUS reviews a clear decision by a lower court and overturns it in favor of continuing to display a huge cross on public land: [ffrf.org]
3
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
4 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.No. The news won’t tell you details, such as where “the Wall” is.
SCOTUS protects children more than it protects adults. If the Bladensburg cross were on school property it would influence children more and SCOTUS would treat it differently.
For more detail, look for “free exercise clause” or “establishment clause” in wikipedia. Search on “scotus free exercise clause” etc and get a bunch more.
Search on “three prong test” for a surprise.
yvilletom
Level 8
Aug 19, 2019
0
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
There is probably some real estate which can purchased near this cross.
I am sure you all know what those statues will be. You've seen the number sticker before. It will be the majority of religious representative symbols spelling out co exist.
Maybe, in this field of dreams, this vacant lot. A real loud, and inaudible scream, is sent to the nation.
It would be a fuck you message to the Supreme Court and the Christian occult.
Statues, Just as big as that ugly fucken cross, stand tall on the land.
Could be a nice quiet group funded effort by a bunch of heathens.
Heathenman
Level 7
June 20, 2019
0
Okay, for some reason my second paragraph was switched while I was typing.
Also my first amendment was attacked. F***. Was written as fuck.