I just saw it and was impressed and sympathized with the boys' suffering. I did see some flaws in the film. I have been interested in the nature-nurture dilemna for some time. In 2010 I earned an interdisciplinary MA in humanities with emphasis on science and ethics. I took a lot of philosophy and history. While the film seemed to imply that Neuberger's unpublished study of identicals reared apart was one of the very few on the topic, truth is most of what we know on nature-nurture is based on such published studies. And these studies suggest what the film based on anecdote seemed to emphasize: a surprising hereditary component to a lot of behavior. However, let's hope that the scientists' findings were a little deeper and more well thought out than the skepticism of science that runs through the film subtlely. OK the research represented in the film was unethical. Let's only hope that other studies of identicals that are so important to our understanding of nature-nurture were more ethical. It is a huge problem in society today that the baby has been thrown out with the bath water as far as science is concerned. Because a few scientists have been unethical or stupid and careless, the whole profession of science is being dismissed. You see this in the anti-vax movement, in people not seeing docs, opting for unproven or quack treatments. Generally disturbing is that the public increasingly views science as something to be believed or taken on faith, like how we view religion, that the conclusions and methods of science are no longer in the realm of fact and evidence but mere opinion. As agnostics or skeptics, this should be of concern to us.

I saw it a couple months ago, very interesting.

Yes, I thought it was fascinating as a social worker and psychology nerd, plus I have identical twins.