There is natural morality.
In living with others, there is a natural morality based upon expectations.
An adult or a group of adults co-living is expected to live independently, self-sufficiently, harmoniously and responsibly. Why would one want as a neighbor one who didn’t?
Parents are expected to prepare their children to do so. If not by their parents then by whom?
Natural morality suggests a Golden Rule, “Live with others harmoniously and responsibly”. To do to another what one will, personally or through others, without their consent is disharmonious. To do so intentionally is irresponsible.
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.There is only one moral anyone needs. It's called empathy, but unfortunately some have none/ zero/ zip. So religions write it down for them eg don't covert thy neighbors partner.........if you posses empathy this is a no brainer as you would not want your neighbor drooling over your partner, so you don't do it to them.
puff
Level 8
Aug 26, 2022
0
One has natural rights. One can believe, choose and do what they will. Because they can, should they? An ability to do something is defined as a natural right if no law can prevent on from doing it. There are different statements as the Golden Rule. "Do to another what you'd want another do to you" "Don't do to another what you would not want another to do to you." "Live and let live."
puff:
@SunshineEast But all based in empathy
@puff Yes, in a selfish sense, though. Empathy relative to one's self. Do to another what you would want another to do to you. Don't do to another what you would not want another to do to you. When I think of empathy, I think of putting myself in the other person's position.
puff:
@SunshineEast Empathy for me is not just the ability to put yourself in another person's position and comprehend how they feel ,it's that same ability but for any life form and even inanimate things eg without empathy Einstein would not have been able to pretend he was observing light and then placing his view point at differing speeds/ positions around it. He was able to put himself in that light's position so to speak aka empathy.
Empathy should not be human centric imo. It is an ability that should be capable of encompassing all other life from whales to microscopic forms. Flora included. Plus as mentioned even inanimate things like light.
Recent Visitors 7
Photos 193 More
Posted by EmmanuelRippinIf you're looking for a new game to dive into, ([playpokerogue.
Posted by RobecologyI haven't seen any "freethoughts" on Twitter lately; but today I found one!
Posted by johnnyrobishWell, somebody had to do it!
Posted by WalterGreensTo every one out there!
Posted by LenHazell53Well would you look at that, and who posted it
Posted by Mike-IMAOpinions base on facts and evidence can change the world.
Posted by ChrisAineWhere is everybody? Don't tell me y'all caught up with Xmas festivities. Anyway Merry Christmas free thinkers. May you get a kiss under the mistletoe..😊
Posted by ScribblerWhy is everyone leaving?
Posted by AryabratIsn't this the most logical and simplistic way to dismiss a fictitious superpower/hero? Or is there anymore way?
Posted by AvaBunWhat are your thoughts?
Posted by terenaskawsHow passionate are you in creating?
Posted by SpinlieselToday, in 1872, the last Indian war east of the Mississippi ended with the capture of Black Hawk.
Posted by SlarsAnother throw back from my orange years.. mad to think they essentially just paid us to play with big toys all day fun job...
Posted by AnabuceriasPhoto is worth 1000 words.
Posted by bobwjrThat's this group
Posted by TourirstMIA: Missing in Administration. I have posted this, twice and of course, it slides under the radar, understandably as Admin has left the building for good?