A Monstrous Media & Murder in Gaza

Imagine how this would have been reported if Russian soldiers had executed Ukrainians in this way. Not like this, you can be sure.

Here is yet another example of stunningly craven journalism from The Guardian, entirely illustrative of what is going on across the British establishment media in its coverage of Israeli war crimes in Gaza for the past 18 months.

We are now a month on from Israel executing 15 paramedics and hiding their bodies in a mass grave. Since then, video footage has surfaced of that atrocity, showing Israeli soldiers firing on a convoy of emergency vehicles that were clearly marked and with their warning lights on.

We have had postmortems of the victims showing they were shot from close-range in the head and torso. And we’ve had eye-witness accounts of the killings.

[consortiumnews.com]

Occasionally I attempt to explain the deceptions of particular medias that are commonly familiar and popular. Here I am again.

Basically large media sources with multiple journalist and or writers in regards to commentary and analysis. Just let me state that we have very few actual investigative journalist anymore within these types of medias. Not just Internet print, but also not on prime time news programs either.

Those I rant against are basically medias that contain variations of both conservative and liberal biased leanings. Journalist that ultimately contradict each others narratives and context within a single media in regards to any given subject matter at hand. You have to be able to really build a trusting relationship with any given journalist on such a media to avoid being duped. They are few, and usually stick to one side or the other. And that takes having a really good sense of already holding an intellectual development of a facts based knowledge that correlates with a wide knowledge of history. Or taking the time to know the right questions not being presented to conduct a proper research on the information thrown at you. In other words, you have to know enough to be able to recognize when particular questions that should be asked aren't be addressed in what you're reading or hearing.

If you're regularly visiting such rather than a news source that primarily sticks to a particular agenda, you can fall into rabbit holes fairly easily. If they aren't confronting both sides of the government/political arena or corporations within an unbiased means, then you're not going to get full disclosure that's imperative. They're leading you towards blind support and entrapment for a sides agenda.

My top fair warnings in the past have been Common Dreams, Truthout, The Nation, The Atlantic, Democracy Now, there's a ton of them. And this one that Cook is exposing---The Guardian. Which is a widely popular British print I've warned about often. The Grayzone has laid out their ties to intelligence agencies on multiple occasions. You might remember Arron Mates take down of Luke Harding of the Guardian in regards to his book on the Steele dossier which he provided no proof within it in regards to the multiple accusations made. Or the other medias or political arena either. Especially the Clinton campaign or DNC.

Anyways---Cook outlines how the Guardian deceptively maneuvers around this case in regards to the IDF attack recently on a medical unit a few weeks ago. Attempting to bring it back into the public and whitewash the evidence that has already been discovered.