IMO, what makes it relevant are the many tens of billions of taxpayers’ dollars/euros that governments ( except Russia ) are spending each year. The little I’ve seen of what Russian astrophysicists are doing said they long ago rejected the Big Bang

Say what you mean in many fewer words, Matt. Ditto for your bio and write it in paragraphs so it’s readable. Or don’t.

He’s not citing the Daily Mail as evidence; he’s saying it published rubbish generated by theoretical physicists.

@yvilletom no he doesn't cite the physicist's publications, only the Daily Mail article.

@MattHardy Matt, you’re on too much of something. Get sober. He doesn’t cite physicist’s mags because he’s dealing with the info the public gets. They read the Daily Mail.
Make your bio readable too.

@yvilletom nice insults, try to demean my looks next, I'm not pretty. Whatever the reason for citing the Daily Mail rather than facts, the conclusions drawn from such nonsense are still garbage in garbage out.

@MattHardy Matt, you seem unable to understand that theoretical physicists sent crap to the Daily Mail to deceive readers and get.more money from taxpayers.

@yvilletom hahahahahahahaha

Your “conventional” science is theoretical, untested and untestable. It is rubbish.

You accept a mathematician’s not understanding gravity, so he invents general relativity, a peculiar-looking “trampoline” and space-time?

Ignorance as usual