This story is apolitical. Purely an attempt to rewrite, concisely, the first book of the bible with scientific accuracy.

@Petter In "concise" scientific explination, can you verify your first line of your written story?

In the beginning there was nothing.

@Word By logic. If there is 'something, then it cannot be the absolute beginning. Only 'nothing' can exist infinitely before 'something'.

Yes, logically start at the beginning. If infinity. as no end, does that mean it must have a beginning?

And, does "nothing " exist? If "nothing" has no existence, then there must have always been "something "?

@Petter logically, how does our current "something " come from nothing? If nothing was before something. How does something come from nothing?

@Petter scientific law gives that mass cannot be created nor destroyed. Converted into energy, E=mc^2.

So, logically, scientifically, it seems something has always existed and wouldn't be too proper to say there was nothing.

BUT, the unknown, not nothing as a starting point, perhaps then building onto what is known.

Why can matter not be created or destroyed?
Matter is anything that has mass and takes up space. ... Matter can change form through physical and chemical changes, but through any of these changes, matter is conserved. The same amount of matter exists before and after the change—none is created or destroyed. This concept is called the Law of Conservation of Mass.Jan 13, 2020
[nationalgeographic.org].

@Word Consider this scenario. There is nothing. Then, something is subtracted from nothing - and directly opposite something is added. The directions and velocity are equal, but opposite. Then, their algebraic sum remains zero, or nothing.

@Petter might work

@Word Hence matter and anti-matter anihilate each other.

@Petter does the annihilation of matter and anti-matter leave space?

@Petter that is, where matter and anti-matter is gone, the space they occupied remains...

@Petter

@Word Such space is full of ..... nothing.

@Petter maybe you haven't seen video posted above before you just commented. I have a slight disagreement with video on somethings, a bit of semantics perhaps.