I read this essay with great interest.
For understanding the Bible, there is— only an image of authority. In reality it has no power. Religion is based off the stability of the Bible, a stability that is undermined by the very people who read the Bible. Confronted with the realization that the writing of the Bible is incapable of bossing us around, the readers, the priests, preachers, any Bible reader, is permitted to superimpose their own interpretations. As their job becomes to interpret the bible for the masses—they have become literary critics themselves. We pick what it means, often according to what we already do, and then just use our interpretation of the Bible as justification for what we have decided to do. - Philosophy for the Many
Strange... So it only about "bible-centered" religions?
Why do we think that God was so approachable 3000 years ago? (S)he does not seem so amenable today.
@Jetty Yes I can well imagine. After all when people first thought about it there was a sun god who arose and then a variable moon god who arose and until they understood why there were thunder gods and river gods all trying to explain phenomena. The sun god eventually transposed into Jesus through Egyptian thought.
But were the prophets really thinking that they saw/talked to god? Was it hallucinations? Was it a way to control people?
@Jetty Does this publication really equate "Faith Instinct" with religion.
Posted by JettyPerspective
Posted by PontifexMarximusWhy Evolution Is True … I never realised that there was still so much opposition to science. [livescience.com]
Posted by NR92What is the reason to live? What are we living for?
Posted by NR92Is it correct that Nietzsche was Hitler's inspiration?
Posted by mzeeWhat is fear?
Posted by DonaldHRobertsThe Most Complicated question ever asked. WHY?
Posted by TheMiddleWayRussel, the greatest salesman the world has ever known!