Any one here know about stoicism.
Very basically the idea the idea of stoicism is that for best results in life accept conditions as they are and not buy into internal emotional responses. A Buddhist response would be to observe but not engage. The are a few other teneOne problem that arises with stoicism is that in its classical context it suggests that it is not possible to change events, determinism, but you can change yourself. This, however seems to conflict with the idea of determinism. The most practical application is to accept what you cannot change. Its summed up by the good old Australian saying "She'll be alright, mate. Have a beer"
I'd start with Heraclitus.
So would I.
Check out Massimo Pigliucci [en.m.wikipedia.org]
@TheMiddleWay I came across Massimo by pure happenstance... I was checking prominent Liberians ... Just because I was plying with words: Libertarian Libarian librarian and Pigliucci's name popped up.
I watched him debating Michael Shermer ...
Many years ago I lost some atheist friend because I said: If science gets elevated beyond reason it because a doctrine that is just a dangerous as religious fundamentalisms.
Moral values cannot be derived from science.
Posted by JettyPerspective
Posted by PontifexMarximusWhy Evolution Is True … I never realised that there was still so much opposition to science. [livescience.com]
Posted by NR92What is the reason to live? What are we living for?
Posted by NR92Is it correct that Nietzsche was Hitler's inspiration?
Posted by mzeeWhat is fear?
Posted by DonaldHRobertsThe Most Complicated question ever asked. WHY?
Posted by TheMiddleWayRussel, the greatest salesman the world has ever known!