Well... he's not wrong
10
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
5 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
And it might have been converted to electric.
dartagnan6666
Level 7
Dec 8, 2018
0
Yep, no "fine print" defining 'green', so he's good to go!
phxbillcee
Level 10
Dec 8, 2018
0
.Love to see the dispute to the fine.
Xanadutoo
Level 7
Dec 8, 2018
2
That reminds me of an article I read a few years ago. There was an English teacher (I think) that got a ticket for running a stop sign. His defence was that "stop" didn't specify what to do. I'm sure that it got thrown out. If you read the manual to get a license, I'm sure there is a legal definition of what the sign means (besides the obvious). If you pass the test, that means you understand the legal definition of signs. If this is some sort of law rather than a company sign, I bet it would be a similar story if he took it to court.
@TheGreatShadow Yes, ignorance of the law is no excuse even if you can't speak the language .It's a little unfair.
@Xanadutoo Yes, ignorance if the law is no excuse (which I have mentioned before). Tried that before. Doesn't work.