I'm doing a piece called " What is a Assault Weapon and Why Should They be Banned" to make it easier to convince companies to cut ties with the NRA, and to help get politicians to ban "weapons of war". That's where that list of people shot in mass shootings came from.
I learned something new about same said guns that surprised me. I thought a fat slow bullet would cause more damage than a small fast moving bullet. Seemed logical to me, man was I wrong. Think of it like the speed of sound, all that turbulence behind the plane is the part that does the most damage.
I'm sure gun lovers are going to try to rip this post to pieces, but this is one thing they can't deny happens. They are going to come totally unglued when they read my whole article.
This is my outline;
Title page What is a assault weapon, and why they should be banned. below that is a picture of a gun with the barrel tied in a knot.
Next page is the tribute to the list you just saw,
next page defines a assault weapon, I used the definition from the 1994 weapons ban.
after that is a doctor explaining how much more damage these guns do over a regular gun
next is the difference the 1994 ban had
Then comes why they should be banned again
followed by my conclusions and what I think
lastly comes Acknowledgments
Hopefully this will make it easier to make a real difference.
1