Conservatives are generally against a welfare state, but it also seems like the majority of conservatives are also for automation because it will keep corporate production costs lower and will in turn lower the cost to the consumer. Automation will generally eliminate the need for employees at "low skilled" jobs for the most part. There are already low skilled workers that have jobs that are already on some form of public assistance because their job doesn't pay a livable wage. cough Walmart cough. Just to name one example.
All those low skilled workers will be out of jobs and most of them will not be able to go to college or learn a trade. Even if they did, they would need to apply for help in paying for it. That money will be coming from the state and federal government.
How can they justify automation and not think that it will cause more of a welfare state?
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
5 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.Maybe they could be people ask customers how they are doing and if you need help. Maybe society could invest in something besides just shopping.
thinkwithme
Level 7
Jan 22, 2018
0
They fail to realize that if they want the public to buy their goods then the public needs a living wage in order to afford those items. I avoid the self checkouts.
Did you notice Wal Mart made a big deal over their bonuses and wage increase but not so much over the closure of their Sams Clubs and the elimination of jobs recategorized and given a lower pay rate which the eliminated employee could apply for. A hospital in Orange County CA pulled this when my brother worked there. Made them all start over as new employees and lost their seniority.
misstuffy
Level 7
Jan 14, 2018
1
Yeah, 63 Sam's Clubs closed and then they got rid of 3,500 co-manager jobs and added 1,700 lower level positions. All in all it's over 10,000 jobs cut. Plus, the $1,000 bonus is only for employees that have been there for at least 20 years. It's a tiered bonus. I think 14-19 years was like $800.....and so on and so on. So the 20 year bonus comes out to $50 a year. Those types of jobs have high turnover so I'm guessing not too many got the $1,000 bonus. They basically got some great PR over the increase and bonus, but it's costing them a fraction of their profits. I think it was like less than 4% of their profits. They look like good guys now with minimal loss. So borrowing about $1.5t over the next however many years was worth it for that type of action? As for the employees reapplying for jobs, it doesn't mean they will get rehired lol
Hmm. It seems to me conservatives are generally against welfare for people, but LOVE corporate welfare. I think they're less concerned at lower prices for the consumer and more concerned at maximizing profits; automation means lowering costs at the same price which increases profits.
bingst
Level 8
Jan 14, 2018
2
This is why the idea of guaranteed income is starting to be floated around in more progressive countries. Don't think we're at that point yet, but just imagine when self-driving vehicles are ready to be rolled out in force. Every truck driver, delivery driver, and cab driver will be out of work.
IntellectualRN
Level 6
Jan 14, 2018
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.