Agnostic.com

1 3

Jordan Peterson isn't perfect.

He is an emotional creature just like the rest of us.
But he is closer to a comprehensive objective picture of the human condition than say, Sam Harris.
But not by much.
And Sam is closer than Richard Dawkins.
And Richard is closer than Christopher Hitchens.
And Christopher was closer than Pat Robertson...
but not by much.

skado 9 Oct 11
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

For a psychologist he seems particularly unhelpful. Social media has helped fuel the divide and the madness that is trump and this administration - IMHO.

I worry that Dr. Peterson's own psychological health may not be in the best place, but in spite of his personal limitations (which we all have) I do think he gets a lot of things right that others miss. In particular, he seems to understand, as Joseph Campbell did, that the original essence of religion was about values, not about a literal interpretation of metaphors. And that's important because people are killing each other over that misunderstanding.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:198927
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.