I think there's more than one source of morality. I have good morals, and since I'm atheist, I don't believe that you have to be religious or a believer in God to have good morals. I think I came upon them thanks to a great upbringing by 2 parents who were good people who had a good sense of what's right and wrong.

It's Inate without it no group would survive

Your sense of right or wrong, a very debatable subject, is a "source of morality." It requires good judgement and high ethical standards. What may be right to you maybe wrong to another person. What may be a morally righteous deed to others could simply be disagreeable to you. If you are a naturally decent and upright and righteous person you certainly would have good judgement or good sense of right or wrong and that's what morality is all about, or, so I thought, hhhhmmmmm . . . hey (King) Solomon, are you there?

. . . excuse me, but I'm getting dizzy going around in circles trying to make sense of what I'm writing - somebody please try to pin down what I'm trying to say here ! ! !

The Bible or whatever Holy Book like the Koran is a good “source of morality” and so are the Eastern and Oriental Books Of Wisdom. Nobody's got a monopoly of "source of morality". Consitutions, basic laws of the land and tribes, codes of ethics and high standards of values . . .

. . . is Tylenol still available in the corner drugstore?