FTA: It is wrong, for example, to imagine that terrorists have always “twisted” their religion from its “true” form. They follow a nefarious, destructive form of religion, but it is still religion. To imply otherwise presents young people with a view that doesn’t fully reflect how they experience religion in contemporary society – where it can motivate great acts of kindness, but also atrocities.
The only "true form" of a given religion is the form held by the person claiming it to be true. Ironically, a terrorist also thinks they practice the "true form". So it's a meaningless distinction.
You're right, religion can motivate a full range of beneficial and harmful behaviors, and furthermore, there's no evidence it's a net win for society that people base their conduct on religious ideation. It's just confirmation bias to claim that a person's goodness is explicable entirely because their motivations are religiously framed. In my view, most people mean well and try their best to do well, often in spite of their religion.