FTA: Kirk Bailey, political director of the ACLU of Florida, says that his group is watching this bill.
“There are acceptable ways to teach about the Bible: schools can teach comparative religion classes or about the Bible’s relationship to literature, art or music. However, it is exceedingly difficult to do so in a constitutionally permissible manner,” Bailey said.
“Ultimately, parents, not the government, should be in charge of religious education. To ensure one faith is not promoted over another in our public schools and to protect our students’ First Amendment rights, we’ll continue to monitor this bill to see how it progresses during this legislative session,” Bailey added.
The Florida is narrow-minded indeed. How could Christians cope if other religious books were also required reading in such a class? No, they would protest.
I see this as an attempt to proselytize at taxpayer's expense. Of course the , as worded, is unconstitutional.
I was already a disbeliever when Ii took two semesters of the History of Religions. ( In the German school system) My father encouraged it because according to his understanding, it would be difficult to study World History without also studying religions. These were elective courses in 10th grade. The material and requirements were quite rigorous, but I did not regret taking the courses.