Good article... I don't necessarily agreed with truth being absolute... Ex. Every rule has an exception...

Yes I agree with that, especially if it is with pedrobds qualification below.

An assertion can be true with respect to one logical system and yet be false with respect to another, depending on the basic assumptions of each system. The assertion might also be undecideable or meaningless in some systems. We’d like to think of truth as absolute but when it comes down to brass tacks our way of knowing is based on assumptions, many of which are superficial or incorrect.

Spiritual people speak of truth as knowledge of a higher or absolute reality. I’m not sure why that is referred to as “truth”, but in any event that is not our everyday truth. Maybe they are talking about mystical experience.

There is truth, knowledge, and experience, all of which are tied together but I’m not sure of just how.

'Objectivity' is a point of view. It is the 'view from nowhere' because 'objectivity' as objective is not possible.

"The View From Nowhere is a book by philosopher Thomas Nagel. Published by Oxford University Press in 1986, it contrasts passive and active points of view in how humanity interacts with the world, relying either on a subjective perspective that reflects a point of view or an objective perspective that takes a more detached perspective. Nagel describes the objective perspective as the "view from nowhere", one where the only valuable ideas are ones derived independently."

Objectivity is a perspective, a point of view, and there is no purely objective viewpoint.

At last! A post with some depth for considered opinion. Well done Matias. Contributions have been a bit weak on here of late!

I concur with this analysis. It’s a mistake, commonly made, to conflate the two.

There is one more point on that.
Sometimes (most of them) truth exists, but it cannot be achieved by the knowledge/capacity that we have (or even in principle cannot be achieved at all like the uncertainty principle).
The objectivity is to get information as close as possible to the truth to the point that is enough for the desired purposes. The whole science is based on that.
Nothing guarantees that the world operate in mathematical laws, but up to today they give us very good approximations.

Good read, thank you.