Agnostic.com

2 0

LINK How Jonathan Sacks dumbs-down Jewish history to defend Zionism | Robert A. H. Cohen

A Closed Debate

"Notice in Sacks’ opening narration that his question is not “Is Anti-Zionism the new antisemitism?” but “How is anti-Zionism the new antisemitism?”.

The starting point is the assertion that anti-Zionism can be nothing other than antisemitism. Counter to the tradition that two Jews will always produce three opinions, Sacks makes clear that this particular subject is not open to the usual rabbinical rigour applied to the interpretation of matters of Jewish law or indeed any other subject of Jewish interest. When it comes to Zionism, only one interpretation is kosher."

WilliamCharles 8 May 9
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

"Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."

~ George Orwell

1

This part really reaches the height of hypocrisy:

Read the Hebrew Bible and you’ll see immediately that it isn’t about the salvation of the soul. It’s about creating in the holy land a society based on the biblical ideas of justice, welfare, the sanctity of life – and caring for the stranger “because you know what it feels like to be a stranger.”

I'll bet they know what the Jehovah of the Bible would think of that. But then, they know after their experiences in WW2 that there is no Jehovah. So they play the Bible for all it's worth and live by the realpolitik of the Nazis.

Sadly accurate, I'm afraid. The victims becoming the victimizers.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:344322
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.