Agnostic.com

1 2

Happy Independence Day weekend🇺🇸 💥💥💥🇺🇸 a construct of the White wealthy to transfer colonists’ anger from local elites to the British.

With regard to the American Revolution, Howard Zinn considers it a contrived product of the colonial elites, a series of hostile responses to British policy, trade and taxation that exaggerated the dangers of these things.

The aim of the revolution, Zinn argues, was to divert colonial class anger of the 1760s, shifting it away from colonial assemblies and onto the British government.

In doing this, the revolutionary elite was able to seize control of part of the British Empire and rule it as their own. They convinced ordinary Americans to support them, using manufactured political ideologies, anti-British paranoia and American nationalism. The revolution, its leaders and its core documents – the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights – were later reinvented as sacred artefacts and became immune from criticism or challenge.

According to A People’s History, the Constitution was an advanced means of law, control and coercion, rather than a brilliant gift from benevolent ‘Founding Fathers’.

Bobbyzen 8 July 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Those ‘colonial elites’ would have been hung high had ‘king george’ got his hands on them! Seems our Founding Fathers were merely ahead of their time - as nearly all British Colonies of that era eventually fought and won their independence..

The Republic those “Colonial Elites” / Founding Fathers gave us was unique, copied, and spread around the world! One could have been ‘King George the First’ - but instead established the tradition of limited Presidencies by stepping down after two terms. They were not perfect - only magnificent!

..howard zinn sounds like one of many terminal conspiracists, someone definitely lacking the courage to start a nation ..only to bitch about the one that allowed him the freedom to do so 😉

PS - not returning to debate BS, enough was too much ~

Varn Level 8 July 5, 2020

Hit-and-run.eh? That’s cool. Do you also believe Natives were “savages”—as enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, and as implemented through policy and treaties, all later broken by the US government.

@Bobby9 they could have easily just sat back and remained elite

That is Zinn’s entire point: this was not a noble war. They wanted all the spoils of the land for themselves, including the natural resources and goods produced by slaves and the gentry. If you look at the vast disparity of distribution of wealth in America, it’s obvious they’ve been wildly successful.

Also, the Natives were more Native than the Europeans by a few thousand years.

@Bobby9 Zinn is stupid. And you tell me I have no clue. You call me an ideologue. Look in the mirror Bobby, and pick up a history book that does not parrot colonialist talking points.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:512498
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.