Happy Independence Day weekend a construct of the White wealthy to transfer colonists’ anger from local elites to the British.
With regard to the American Revolution, Howard Zinn considers it a contrived product of the colonial elites, a series of hostile responses to British policy, trade and taxation that exaggerated the dangers of these things.
The aim of the revolution, Zinn argues, was to divert colonial class anger of the 1760s, shifting it away from colonial assemblies and onto the British government.
In doing this, the revolutionary elite was able to seize control of part of the British Empire and rule it as their own. They convinced ordinary Americans to support them, using manufactured political ideologies, anti-British paranoia and American nationalism. The revolution, its leaders and its core documents – the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights – were later reinvented as sacred artefacts and became immune from criticism or challenge.
According to A People’s History, the Constitution was an advanced means of law, control and coercion, rather than a brilliant gift from benevolent ‘Founding Fathers’.
Those ‘colonial elites’ would have been hung high had ‘king george’ got his hands on them! Seems our Founding Fathers were merely ahead of their time - as nearly all British Colonies of that era eventually fought and won their independence..
The Republic those “Colonial Elites” / Founding Fathers gave us was unique, copied, and spread around the world! One could have been ‘King George the First’ - but instead established the tradition of limited Presidencies by stepping down after two terms. They were not perfect - only magnificent!
..howard zinn sounds like one of many terminal conspiracists, someone definitely lacking the courage to start a nation ..only to bitch about the one that allowed him the freedom to do so
PS - not returning to debate BS, enough was too much ~
Hit-and-run.eh? That’s cool. Do you also believe Natives were “savages”—as enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, and as implemented through policy and treaties, all later broken by the US government.
@Bobby9 they could have easily just sat back and remained elite
That is Zinn’s entire point: this was not a noble war. They wanted all the spoils of the land for themselves, including the natural resources and goods produced by slaves and the gentry. If you look at the vast disparity of distribution of wealth in America, it’s obvious they’ve been wildly successful.
Also, the Natives were more Native than the Europeans by a few thousand years.