This is slightly - no, horribly - misleading. $600 is a drop in the bucket FOR AN INDIVIDUAL.

And if you have a gripe, complain to the disgusting, sub-human, wretched and putrid REPUBLICONS.

So what's your agenda.

You missed the 100% tax deduction for business luncheons. No lawsuits for companies who order their employees back to work even tho the company is not providing a safe work environment, etc. There was also more funding for the military industrial complex.
Priorities really need some work.

Yes, I heard about the addition in Smithsonian and thought it very odd to be building new collections of museums at this time! How grossly inappropriate to worry about building new collections based on American women and American Latinos' accomplishment when we have the real thing, the real HUMAN BEINGS, suffering, losing jobs, losing businesses and falling deeper into poverty and misery. How many women and Latinis are steuggling to provide for essential needs at thus time? How utterly patronizing of government! Fund PEOPLE not GOVERNMENT! Leaders are coming across as COMPLETELY DISASSOCIATED from working Americans reality. Which party initiated this out of touch idea?

"The pandemic-induced poverty surge will also widen the gender poverty gap – meaning, more women will be pushed into extreme poverty than men." UNwomen.org

"Nationally, the NPR poll finds that 63% of Latinos report they have lost household income either through reduced hours or wages, furloughs or job loss since the start of the pandemic." NPR

While I'm also unhappy about $600/$300, Democrats would have doubled those, I must point out for the foreign aid (and domestic funding) that the bill is tucked in to a greater funding bill that encompasses u$A spending.