Agnostic.com

4 1

Very interesting entry I found. Well worth the read.

Quote of the day: "The history of compulsory vaccination is not a success story, rather the opposite. (...) It is a culture of mistrust that breaks with the success story of voluntarism in Germany." ( Medical historian Malte Thießen, Hart aber fair, ARD)

"If mandatory vaccination is enforced in Austria, other European and Western countries will follow. Then the totalitarian trap would have snapped shut, probably irrevocably. (...) If Vienna falls, the world falls, and we must counter this with a decisive 'No pasaran!ʽ." (Martin Lichtmesz, COMPACT 1/2022

[compact-shop.de]

Captain_Feelgood 8 Jan 18
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

There is actually plenty of evidence in the US for people to be suspicious of vaccines. They are well documented to have done grave harm to minorities and military personnel. I understand the mistrust they must feel. The rest of us have all had good experiences with vaccines so we can't relate. We must be mindful of those hurt or knowing of those hurt from vaccines.

0

The history of compulsory vaccination is a success story. Diptheria, measles, polio, pertussis (whooping cough), mumps, small pox, rubella, tetanus, chickenpox, rabies, and yellow fever have all been eliminated or nearly so by vaccination.

People used to trust doctors and scientists. Now we live in the age of misinformation where the ignorant and selfish and greedy spread lies and conspiracy theories via the internet. Too many people would rather takes worthless "herbal" remedies, drink their own urine, and listen to quacks and snakeoil salesman than listen to actual proven science.

Keep in mind a vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. What they are giving folks is NOT a vaccine. It OBVIOUSLY does NOT provide any immunity to this disease... The shit they're shooting into people only may reduce the severity of your sickness IF you get infected. Then keep in mind on top of that the death rate is barely 1%... (Added edit here) And you should also recognize these are not conspiracy theories or misinformation like you get from CNN and MSNBC...
You Want Proof Of Ivermectin Effectiveness ? Here It Is!
MAY 19, 2021 / BRIANPECKFORD
Front Line Covid 19 Critical Care Alliance.

One Page Summary of the Clinical Trials Evidence for Ivermectin in COVID-19

Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medicine whose discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015, has proven, highly potent, anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties in laboratory studies. In the past 4 months, numerous, controlled clinical trials from multiple centers and countries worldwide are reporting consistent, large improvements in COVID-19 patient outcomes when treated with ivermectin. Our comprehensive scientific review of these referenced trials can be found on the Open Science Foundation pre-print server here: [osf.io].

Properties of Ivermectin

  1. Ivermectin inhibits the replication of many viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and others;

  2. Ivermectin has potent anti-inflammatory properties with multiple mechanisms of inhibition;

  3. Ivermectin diminishes viral load and protects against organ damage in animal models;

  4. Ivermectin prevents transmission of COVID-19 when taken either pre- or post-exposure;

  5. Ivermectin hastens recovery and decreases hospitalization and mortality in patients with COVID-19;

  6. Ivermectin leads to far lower case-fatality rates in regions with widespread use.

Evidence Base Supporting the Efficacy of Ivermectin in COVID-19 as of January 11, 2021 (RCT’s = randomized controlled trials, OCT’s = observational controlled trials).

Every clinical trial shows a benefit, with RCT’s and OCT’s reporting the same direction and magnitude; nearly all are statistically significant.

Controlled trials studying the prevention of COVID-19 (8 trials completed)

• 3 RCT’s with large statistically significant reductions in transmission rates, a total of 774 patients

• 5 OCT’s with large statistically significant reductions in transmission rates, a total of 2,052 patients

Controlled trials in the treatment of both early and hospitalized COVID-19 patients (19 trials completed)

• 5 RCT’s with large, significant reductions in time to recovery or hospital length of stay, a total of 774 patients

• 1 RCT with a large, statistically significant reduction in rate of deterioration/hospitalization, total of 363 patients

• 2 RCT’s with significant decreases in viral load, days of anosmia, cough, or time to recovery, a total of 85 patients

• 3 RCT’s with large, significant reductions in mortality, a total of 695 patients

• 3 OCT’s with large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, a total of 1,688 patients

Number of Studies and Patients Among the Existing Clinical Trials of Ivermectin in COVID-19

• 27 controlled trials, including a total of 6,612 patients have been completed using well-matched control groups

• 16 trials, including over 2,500 patients, are prospective, randomized, controlled studies

• 11 of the 27 trials have been published in peer-reviewed journals, 3,900 patients, remainder are in pre-print

Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance – Recommendation on Ivermectin in COVID-19

Even restricting analysis to just the 16 randomized controlled trials (totaling over 2,500 patients), the majority report a statisti- cally significant reduction in transmission or disease progression or mortality. Further, a meta-analysis recently performed by an independent research consortium calculated the chances that ivermectin is ineffective in COVID-19 to be 1 in 67 million.1

The FLCCC Alliance, based on the totality of the existing evidence, supports an A-I recommendation (NIH rating scheme; strong level, high quality evidence) for the use of ivermectin in both the prophylaxis and treatment of all phases of COVID-19.

Furthermore, we encourage all regulatory agencies to review our manuscript detailing these studies above as well as the multiple population-wide “natural experiments” that occurred in numerous cities and regions after the initiation of ivermectin distribution programs.

The widespread use of ivermectin resulted in a significant reduction in cases and mortality rates that approached pre-pandemic levels in these areas. As evidenced by what occurred in these regions, ivermectin is clearly an essential and vital treatment component in achieving control of the pandemic.

1 ivmmeta.com

2 Kory P, Meduri GU, Iglesias J, Varon J et al. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and

Treatment of COVID-19. Open Science Foundation. [osf.io]

For more information about the FLCCC Alliance, the I-MASK+ Prophylaxis & Early Outpatient Treatment

Protocol for COVID-19 and the MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19, please visit [flccc.net]

@Captain_Feelgood Well, the overwhelming majority of doctors and scientists on the entire planet agree that horse medicine will not protect you against Covid.

Also, yes, the Covid vaccine does work. Half the planet has received the vaccine. The World Health Organization, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency advise against the use of ivermectin for COVID-19 outside of clinical trials.

In November 2021 the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine retracted a paper written by Kory, Marik, and others. The retraction was triggered when it was found the paper misreported the mortality figures of people treated for COVID-19 with the FLCCC's "MATH+" protocol, falsely making it appear to be an effective treatment.

But I don't expect you to believe proven science. Quackery is the way to go, right?

@Charles1971 Dude... What part of "provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease" did you NOT understand ??? (Seriously, you DO know what they're shooting into people is NOT a fucking vaccine,,, right?) And for the record,, when someone goes into the hospital for ,,, and dies of, a gunshot wound to the chest, but also tests positive for covid,,,, saying they died of covid is a bullshit lie, and you know it... False covid death reports are ramped and have been sense the start. Come on, man... Try being at least a LITTLE honest intellectually..

@Captain_Feelgood So... your logic is that a handful of doctors and their research... which has been overwhelmingly rejected by the vast majority of doctors on the planet... this tiny minority of doctors not only know the real truth but also that all the other doctors in the world are either too dumb or have been duped by Big Pharma (or the Illuminati or whatever). Sure, that seems plausible. How about YOU try being intellectually honest as well as realistic?

@Charles1971 Mmmmm, No,,, the actual definition of the word vaccine is what is in question here. Do you accept the worldly accepted definition or not? Let's just start with that, and then I'll continue to dismantle the rest of your argument.

0

Ohferpetessake......

1

Bring back Adolf. Nobody argued in those days!

Good luck Brandon

Arguing would get you in trouble back then. I can't remember, did those gas chambers run on regular or unleaded? 😒

@Captain_Feelgood Leaded, which meant they weren't very good for your health.

@Puff Gook luck.... Let's go... what ever. As long as Biden's sorry ass is gone in a couple more years.

@Captain_Feelgood Biden couldn't do any worse than Trump did. So far, after only one year Biden is significantly better than Trump's trainwreck presidency of lies and scandals plus one treasonous attempt at a coup.

@Captain_Feelgood Depends which bum follows him.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:645916
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.